20.06.2013 Views

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Matter</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Mirror</strong> 107<br />

change in the eyes is not evident to us although it is present<br />

(for the nature of the discharges is the same <strong>as</strong> that of semen);<br />

<strong>and</strong> the air is moved by them, <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong> a certain effect on the air<br />

on the surface of the mirror which is continuous with it, i.e. it<br />

makes that air affected in the same way that it is itself; <strong>and</strong> the<br />

air on the mirror affects the surface of the mirror. As in the<br />

c<strong>as</strong>e of clothes, the purest mirrors are most quickly stained; for<br />

a pure mirror shows accurately whatever it receives, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

purest shows the smallest movements. The bronze, because it<br />

is smooth, perceives best any touch at all (one should think of<br />

the touch of the air <strong>as</strong> a sort of rubbing, — like a wiping or a<br />

w<strong>as</strong>hing), <strong>and</strong> because it is pure the touch, however slight it<br />

may be, becomes apparent in it. The re<strong>as</strong>on why the stain does<br />

not leave new mirrors quickly is their purity <strong>and</strong> smoothness;<br />

for in their c<strong>as</strong>e it penetrates both in depth <strong>and</strong> all over —<br />

in depth because of their purity, all over because of their<br />

smoothness. The stain does not remain on old mirrors because<br />

it does not penetrate in the same way but more superficially. 179<br />

In this amazing description of tactile vision, Aristotle introduces the<br />

bloody mirror to account for time-delayed action that occurs in our sensory<br />

organs while we are dreaming; the story serves him <strong>as</strong> example of how senseimpressions<br />

linger in the mind, even when the object that caused them is no<br />

longer present. The dream is a phenomenon analogous to sense-perception.<br />

Obviously, it may be subsumed under the larger category of events called<br />

“action at a distance.” Moreover we learn from this p<strong>as</strong>sage that a material<br />

exchange takes place between eye <strong>and</strong> reflecting surface to such an extent<br />

that the reflected object (in our c<strong>as</strong>e, a menstruating woman) may even stain<br />

a mirror. Obviously, in the process of reflection (that is in our context, while<br />

we are dreaming) some sort of matter is impressed with a form. And indeed,<br />

the story of the bloody mirror provides us with the key to the mechanisms<br />

of transmission, reflection, transformation, <strong>and</strong> retention of dreams in our<br />

imagination <strong>as</strong> the images are captured by a reflecting surface.<br />

The theoretical <strong>as</strong>sumptions that structure the account of the<br />

bloody mirror may be outlined in the following way: a beam of highly refined<br />

menstrual blood is emitted by pores of the body <strong>and</strong> the sense organs<br />

179 Trans. J. I. Beare in Aristotle (1984) 73; 459b 28–30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!