20.06.2013 Views

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Matter</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Mirror</strong> 85<br />

by maintaining that the soul’s image is reflected in the physical world, though<br />

in a deceptive way. “[This lower part of the soul] is pictured <strong>as</strong> being present<br />

in bodies since it shines into them <strong>and</strong> makes living creatures, but not of itself<br />

<strong>and</strong> body, but abiding itself <strong>and</strong> giving images of itself, like a face seen in<br />

many mirrors.” 120 According to Plotinus, matter reflects soul in many different<br />

images, but without ever entering into union with soul. Hence, in Plotinus,<br />

the mirror is a metaphor signifying detachment, <strong>as</strong> opposed to communication<br />

or sexual union. <strong>Ficino</strong> sometimes uses the mirror in an analogous way:<br />

for instance, when he compares the way the mind perceives corporeal beings<br />

to the reflection of the flame of a c<strong>and</strong>le in the mirror where the fire is not hot.<br />

In a way reminiscent of celestial fire (which lacks heat), this is an instant in<br />

which the lower (the body of the c<strong>and</strong>le’s coarse material flame) is subsumed<br />

by a higher potency (mind) <strong>and</strong> purified <strong>and</strong> de-materialised in the process.<br />

Yet, in accordance with the <strong>as</strong>cent towards the divine so characteristic<br />

of Neoplatonic philosophies in general, the process may also work the<br />

other way around: instead of conveying the idea or the image of deception<br />

<strong>and</strong> deterioration, the mirror may focus divine influx. Quite unexpectedly,<br />

<strong>Ficino</strong> sometimes even maintains that the rays of common light are “restored<br />

<strong>and</strong> illuminated” in the mirror:<br />

Indeed, so great is the “friendship” of light for the mirror that<br />

lights <strong>and</strong> visual rays <strong>and</strong> radial images are not dissipated or<br />

weakened in it, but immediately enhanced <strong>and</strong> strengthened.<br />

Thus intensified, […] the light instantly illuminates a wall<br />

opposite. 121<br />

In several other instances <strong>Ficino</strong> maintains that the light that falls<br />

onto a body is collected there <strong>and</strong> (presumably after a certain time) reinvigorates<br />

again, especially in bodies that are congruous to it. Then the light starts<br />

to redirect itself in the opposite direction, just <strong>as</strong> a mirror c<strong>as</strong>ts light “on the<br />

opposite wall <strong>and</strong> creates splendour there.” Thus, the light first orders this<br />

120 Enneads I, 8 15–17.<br />

121 In Timaeum def. 30, OO 473: “Tanta profecto amicitia luminis est ad speculum,<br />

ut in hoc ipso lumina radii visuales, radiales imagines non infrangantur quidem, sed ita<br />

protinus invalescant, ut hinc statim multiplicatum lumen oppositum illuminet parietem,<br />

[…].” See Allen (1989) 185.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!