20.06.2013 Views

English - McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program

English - McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program

English - McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>McKnight</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong> <strong>Collaborative</strong> <strong>Crop</strong>s <strong>Research</strong> Project No: 06-741<br />

Ikhanoda-Village, Singida<br />

At Ikhanoda village, 12 farmers participated at the on-farm evaluation and results are as presented in<br />

Table 9 below. Line TZA 263 was the most preferred while IT 89KD 288 was the least preferred line.<br />

Table 9: Pair-wise ranking for Ikhanoda village<br />

Lines 1 2 3 4 5 Result Rank<br />

IT 99K 7-21-2-2 1 1 1 5 3 2<br />

IT 99K 573-1-1 2 2 5 2 3<br />

1T 97K 818-35 4 5 1 4<br />

1T 89KD 288 5 0 5<br />

TZA 263 4 1<br />

Kikombo village, Dodoma<br />

In Kikombo village, 6 farmers participated at the on-farm evaluation and results are as presented in<br />

Table 10 below. Line TZA 263 was the most preferred but IT 89KD 288 was the least preferred line.<br />

Table 10: Pair-wise ranking for Kikombo village<br />

Lines 1 2 3 4 5 Result Rank<br />

IT 99K 7-21-2-2-1 3 2<br />

IT 99K 573-1 1 2 3<br />

1T 97K 818-35 1 2 1 4<br />

1T 89KD 288 1 2 3 0 5<br />

TZA 263 5 5 5 5 4 1<br />

Mkungugu –Ismani, Iringa<br />

In Mkungugu village, 10 farmers belonging to Ari Mpya farmer research group participated at the onfarm<br />

evaluation. Results are as presented in Table 11 below. Line TZA 263 was the most preferred and<br />

IT 97K 818-35 was the least preferred line.<br />

Table 11: Pair-wise ranking for Mkungugu village<br />

Lines 1 2 3 4 5 Result Rank<br />

IT 99K 7-21-2-2-1 1 1 1 5 3 2<br />

IT 99K 573-1 2 2 5 2 3<br />

1T 97K 818-35 4 5 0 5<br />

1T 89KD 288 5 1 4<br />

TZA 263<br />

Mangalali - Iringa<br />

5 1<br />

For unforeseen reasons it was not possible to evaluate the materials on day the team visited Mangalali<br />

village. When the farmers from Managalali visited Ismani research station, they were given opportunity<br />

to evaluate replicated trial planted with 14 lines including those planted at their own plots at Mangalali.<br />

The results are as presented in Table 12 below, where TZA 263 was ranked the best line followed by<br />

IT99K-7-21-2-2.<br />

Table 12: Ranking of the cowpea lines by Mangalali farmers at Ismani research Station 2009<br />

No Cowpea line Number of Number of Ranking of the Comment<br />

participants farmers selected cowpea line<br />

1 TZA-263 26 24 1 Each farmer<br />

2 IT99K-7-21-2-2-1 20 2<br />

was given a<br />

3 B 301 9 3<br />

chance of<br />

4 ITOOK-1207 8 4<br />

selecting only<br />

5<br />

6<br />

IT96D-733<br />

IT89KD-288<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

5<br />

best three<br />

cowpea lines<br />

7 IT99K-573-1 3 6<br />

9<br />

2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!