21.06.2013 Views

Introduction to String Theory and D–Branes - School of Natural ...

Introduction to String Theory and D–Branes - School of Natural ...

Introduction to String Theory and D–Branes - School of Natural ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V a (x). But we can now relate this component <strong>to</strong> another object which has an index which is contravariant<br />

under general coordinate transformations, V µ . These objects are related by our h<strong>and</strong>y vielbiens: V a (x) =<br />

e a µ (x)V µ .<br />

2.14.3 The Lorentz Group as a Gauge Group<br />

The st<strong>and</strong>ard covariant derivative <strong>of</strong> e.g., a contravariant vec<strong>to</strong>r V µ , has a counterpart for V a = e a µ V µ :<br />

DνV µ = ∂νV µ + Γ µ νκV κ ⇒ DνV a = ∂νV a + ω a bνV b ,<br />

where ω a bν is the spin connection, which we can write as a 1–form in either basis:<br />

ω a b = ω a bµdx µ = ω a bµe µ c e c νdx ν = ω a bce c .<br />

We can think <strong>of</strong> the two Minkowski indices (a, b) from the space tangent structure as labeling components<br />

<strong>of</strong> ω as an SO(1, D−1) matrix in the fundamental representation. So in an analogy with Yang–Mills theory,<br />

ωµ is rather like a gauge potential <strong>and</strong> the gauge group is the Lorentz group. Actually, the most natural<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the spin connection is in the structure equations <strong>of</strong> Cartan. One defines the <strong>to</strong>rsion T a , <strong>and</strong><br />

the curvature R a b, both 2–forms, as follows:<br />

T a ≡ 1<br />

2 T a bce a ∧ e b = de a + ω a b ∧ e b<br />

R a b ≡ 1<br />

2 Ra bcde c ∧ e d = dω a b + ω a c ∧ ω c b . (109)<br />

Now consider a Lorentz transformation e a → e ′a = Λ a be b . It is amusing <strong>to</strong> work out how the <strong>to</strong>rsion changes.<br />

Writing the result as T ′a = Λ a bT b , the reader might like <strong>to</strong> check that this implies that the spin connection<br />

must transform as (treating everything as SO(1, D − 1) matrices):<br />

ω → ΛωΛ −1 − dΛ · Λ −1 , i.e., ωµ → ΛωµΛ −1 − ∂µΛ · Λ −1 , (110)<br />

or infinitesimally we can write Λ = e −Θ , <strong>and</strong> it is:<br />

A further check shows that the curvature two–form does<br />

δω = dΘ + [ω, Θ] . (111)<br />

R → R ′ = ΛRΛ −1 , or δR = [R, Θ] , (112)<br />

which is awfully nice. This shows that the curvature 2–form is the analogue <strong>of</strong> the Yang–Mills field strength<br />

2–form. The following rewriting makes it even more suggestive:<br />

R a b = 1<br />

2 Ra bµνdx µ ∧ dx ν , R a bµν = ∂µω a bν − ∂νω a bµ + [ωµ, ων] a<br />

b .<br />

2.14.4 Fermions in Curved Spacetime<br />

Another great thing about this formalism is that it allows us <strong>to</strong> nicely discuss fermions in curved spacetime.<br />

Recall first <strong>of</strong> all that we can represent the Lorentz group with the Γ–matrices as follows. The group’s<br />

algebra is:<br />

[Jab, Jcd] = −i(ηadJbc + ηbcJad − ηacJbd − ηdbJac) , (113)<br />

with Jab = −Jba, <strong>and</strong> we can define via the Clifford algebra:<br />

{Γ a , Γ b } = 2η ab , J ab = − i a b<br />

Γ , Γ<br />

4<br />

, (114)<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!