22.06.2013 Views

Polyharmonic boundary value problems

Polyharmonic boundary value problems

Polyharmonic boundary value problems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.1 Classical <strong>problems</strong> from elasticity 3<br />

Formula (1.1) for Jsb highlights the curvature and the arclength. A two-dimensional<br />

analogue of this functional is the Willmore functional, which is discussed below in<br />

Section 1.8. Note that the functional Jsb does not include a term that corresponds to<br />

an increase in the length of the beam which would occur if the ends are fixed and<br />

the beam would bend. That is, the function in H2 ∩ H1 0 (a,b) minimising Jsb(u) −<br />

b<br />

a pu dx should be an approximation for the so-called supported beam which is<br />

free to move in horizontal directions at its endpoints.<br />

For small deformations of a beam an approximation that takes care of stretching,<br />

bending and a force density would be<br />

J(u) =<br />

b<br />

a<br />

12 u ′′ (x) 2 + c 2 u′ (x) 2 − p(x)u(x) dx,<br />

where c > 0 represents the initial tension of the beam which is also fixed horizontally<br />

at the endpoints.<br />

The linear Euler-Lagrange equation that arises from this situation contains both<br />

second and fourth order terms:<br />

u ′′′′ − cu ′′ = p. (1.2)<br />

If one lets the beam move freely at the <strong>boundary</strong> points (and in the case of zero initial<br />

tension), one arrives at the simplest fourth order equation u ′′′′ = p. This differential<br />

equation may be complemented with several <strong>boundary</strong> conditions.<br />

Fig. 1.1 The depicted <strong>boundary</strong> condition for the left endpoints of these four beams is “clamped”.<br />

The <strong>boundary</strong> conditions for the right endpoints are respectively “hinged” and “simply supported”<br />

on the left; on the right one finds “free” and one that allows vertical displacement but fixes the<br />

derivative by a sliding mechanism.<br />

The mathematical formulation that corresponds to the <strong>boundary</strong> conditions in<br />

Figure 1.1 are as follows:<br />

• Clamped: u(a) = 0 = u ′ (a), also known as homogeneous Dirichlet <strong>boundary</strong> conditions.<br />

• Hinged: u(b) = 0 = u ′′ (b), also known as homogeneous Navier <strong>boundary</strong> conditions.<br />

This is not a real hinged situation since the vertical position is fixed but the<br />

beam is allowed to slide in the hinge itself.<br />

• Simply supported: max(u(b),0)u ′′′ (b) = 0 = u ′′ (b). In applications, when the<br />

force is directed downwards, this <strong>boundary</strong> condition simplifies to the hinged<br />

one u(b) = 0 = u ′′ (b). However, when upward forces are present it might happen<br />

that u(b) > 0 and then the natural <strong>boundary</strong> condition u ′′′ (b) = 0 appears.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!