22.06.2013 Views

Polyharmonic boundary value problems

Polyharmonic boundary value problems

Polyharmonic boundary value problems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4 Hilbert space theory 35<br />

To the linear differential operator A defined by<br />

we associate the bilinear form<br />

Ψ(u,v) = (u,v) +∑(−1) ◦<br />

|β|<br />

<br />

Au := (−∆) m u +∑ D<br />

◦<br />

β [aβ,µ(x)D µ u] (2.28)<br />

Ω<br />

a β,µ(x)D µ uD β vdx for all u,v ∈ H m (Ω), (2.29)<br />

where (., .) is defined in (2.13). Formally, Ψ is obtained by integrating by parts<br />

<br />

Auv and by neglecting the <strong>boundary</strong> integrals. We point out that, in view of (2.27),<br />

Ψ(u,v) is well-defined for all u,v ∈ Hm (Ω).<br />

Let us recall that m j denotes the highest order derivatives of u appearing in B j.<br />

With no loss of generality, we may assume that the <strong>boundary</strong> conditions (2.25) are<br />

ordered for increasing m j’s so that<br />

m j ≤ m j+1 for all j = 1,...,m − 1. (2.30)<br />

Moreover, we assume that the coefficients in (2.25) satisfy<br />

b j,α ∈ C 2m−m j (Ω) for all j = 1,...,m and |α| ≤ m j; (2.31)<br />

by this, we mean that the functions b j,α are restrictions to the <strong>boundary</strong> ∂Ω of<br />

functions in C 2m−m j(Ω).<br />

We also need to define well-behaved systems of <strong>boundary</strong> operators.<br />

Definition 2.10. Let k ∈ N + . We say that the <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>value</strong> operators {Fj(x;D)} k j=1<br />

satisfying (2.30) form a normal system on ∂Ω if mi < m j whenever i < j and if<br />

Fj(x;D) contains the term ∂ m j/∂ν m j with a coefficient different from 0 on ∂Ω.<br />

Moreover, we say that {Fj(x;D)} k j=1 is a Dirichlet system if, in addition to the<br />

above conditions, we have m j = j − 1 for j = 1,...,k; the number k is then called<br />

the order of the Dirichlet system.<br />

Remark 2.11. The assumption “Fj contains the term ∂ m j/∂ν m j with a coefficient<br />

different from 0 on ∂Ω” requires some explanations since it may happen that the<br />

term ∂ m j/∂ν m j does not appear explicitly in Fj. One should then rewrite the <strong>boundary</strong><br />

conditions on ∂Ω in local coordinates; the system of coordinates should contain<br />

the n − 1 tangential directions and the normal direction ν. Then the assumption is<br />

that in this new system of coordinates the term ∂ m j/∂ν m j indeed appears with a<br />

coefficient different from 0. For instance, imagine that m j = 2 and that ∆u represents<br />

the terms of order 2 in Fj; it is known that if ∂Ω and u are smooth, then<br />

∆u = ∂ 2u ∂ν 2 + (n − 1)H ∂u<br />

∂ν + ∆τu on ∂Ω, where H denotes the mean curvature at the<br />

<strong>boundary</strong> and ∆τu denotes the tangential Laplacian of u. Therefore, any <strong>boundary</strong><br />

operator which contains ∆ as principal part satisfies this condition.<br />

It is clear that if a normal system of <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>value</strong> operators {Fj(x;D)} k j=1 is<br />

such that mk = k − 1, then it is a Dirichlet system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!