Final Evaluation of the - UNEP
Final Evaluation of the - UNEP
Final Evaluation of the - UNEP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88. A GIS/database is available for <strong>the</strong> Nara site but without guidelines or technical advice<br />
from Oslo or <strong>the</strong> RCU, it was too general to be <strong>of</strong> use for range management at <strong>the</strong><br />
community level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terroir. The database was developed because <strong>the</strong> National IVP team<br />
saw it as an outcome in <strong>the</strong> PD. It has not been developed as a strategically important tool that<br />
will contribute towards achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Project Objective.<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> Progress<br />
89. Despite <strong>the</strong> goodwill created at Nara, achieving <strong>the</strong> Project Objective is unlikely and <strong>the</strong><br />
community has yet to implement <strong>the</strong>ir plans. The project should continue and it is hoped that<br />
UNDP will continue to fund <strong>the</strong> Nara site as a stand-alone project to prevent loss <strong>of</strong> trust and<br />
confidence. The project can continue for some months with budget neutral funding and <strong>the</strong>n<br />
seek an interim bridging period before continuing as a range management project. Ideas for<br />
funding agencies have been summarised by <strong>the</strong> National consultant (Annex B)<br />
90. Summary <strong>of</strong> Progress: Despite creating goodwill, fostering <strong>the</strong> community empowerment<br />
and a process <strong>of</strong> decentralization, progress towards achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Project Objective in<br />
Mali remains slow and is rated Moderately Unsatisfactory.<br />
Kenya<br />
91. Twenty-three years ago <strong>the</strong> UNESCO/ German funded Integrated Project in Arid Lands<br />
(IPAL) headquartered in Marsabit in Kenya (but also working in Turkana) was closed after<br />
seven years and an input <strong>of</strong> huge resources. Its three long-term objectives were:<br />
1. To seek solutions for urgent environmental and sociological problems associated with<br />
ecological degradation and desert encroachment through research to understand managementoriented<br />
interactions between man and his arid environments and through training and<br />
orientation in resource management techniques associated with <strong>the</strong> Project studies.<br />
2. To investigate all aspects <strong>of</strong> human ecology and social organization which pertain to<br />
traditional land use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> arid rangelands and which may contribute to beneficial changes in<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir management.<br />
3. To investigate alternative forms <strong>of</strong> economy and land use consistent with <strong>the</strong> sustained<br />
health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human environment.<br />
92. IPAL’s components included vegetation ecology (with range and woodland being split);<br />
livestock studies (animal ecology and production); and education, training & extension. IPAL<br />
created a ‘well-prepared and comprehensive management plan covering every aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
development in this area’. It also recommended a permanent research institution called <strong>the</strong><br />
33