28.06.2013 Views

Asset Comparison of Re-contesting MLAs in West Bengal 2011 ...

Asset Comparison of Re-contesting MLAs in West Bengal 2011 ...

Asset Comparison of Re-contesting MLAs in West Bengal 2011 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

109 Kallol Khan AITC AITC NAKASHIPA<br />

RA<br />

110 JAJNESWAR<br />

DAS<br />

111 Aloke<br />

Kumar Das<br />

112 KANIKA<br />

GANGULY<br />

CPI(M) CPI(M) PATHARPRA<br />

TIMA<br />

CPI(M) CPI(M) RANAGHAT<br />

DAKSHIN<br />

(SC)<br />

Nakashipara 4,00,800 4<br />

Lacs+<br />

Patharpratima 5,59,500 5<br />

Lacs+<br />

Ranaghat <strong>West</strong> 4,93,539 4<br />

Lacs+<br />

CPI(M) CPI(M) BALLY Bally 33,78,306 3<br />

3 Lacs+<br />

113 DEBESH DAS CPI(M) CPI(M) ENTALLY Taltola 19,65,940 1<br />

9 Lacs+<br />

114 Nabanita<br />

Mukherjee<br />

CPI(M) CPI(M) LABPUR Labhpur 3,32,999 3<br />

Lacs+<br />

115 Samar Hazra CPI(M) IND JAMALPUR<br />

(SC)<br />

116 Asit Kumar<br />

Mal<br />

117 PRATIM<br />

CHATTERJEE<br />

118 MD. SHELIM<br />

GAIN<br />

119 Ranjit<br />

Kundu<br />

Jamalpur 5,95,955 5<br />

Lacs+<br />

INC INC HANSAN Hansan 2,24,419 2<br />

Lacs+<br />

CPI(M) IND TARAKESW<br />

AR<br />

Tarakeswar 44,58,728 4<br />

4 Lacs+<br />

CPI(M) CPI(M) Baduria Baduria 11,11,097 1<br />

1 Lacs+<br />

CPI(M) CPI(M) NAIHATI Naihati 25,71,857 2<br />

5 Lacs+<br />

120 AMAR BASU CPI(M) CPI(M) JHARGRAM Jhargram 6,52,816 6<br />

Lacs+<br />

6,121 6 T<br />

hou+<br />

2,06,858<br />

2 Lacs+<br />

1,42,054<br />

1 Lacs+<br />

30,69,750<br />

30 Lacs+<br />

16,82,729<br />

16 Lacs+<br />

64,000 64<br />

Thou+<br />

3,46,534<br />

3 Lacs+<br />

8,450 8 T<br />

hou+<br />

42,47,840<br />

42 Lacs+<br />

9,26,168<br />

9 Lacs+<br />

23,92,379<br />

23 Lacs+<br />

4,73,738<br />

4 Lacs+<br />

3,94,679 3<br />

Lacs+<br />

3,52,642 3<br />

Lacs+<br />

3,51,485 3<br />

Lacs+<br />

3,08,556 3<br />

Lacs+<br />

2,83,211 2<br />

Lacs+<br />

2,68,999 2<br />

Lacs+<br />

2,49,421 2<br />

Lacs+<br />

2,15,969 2<br />

Lacs+<br />

2,10,888 2<br />

Lacs+<br />

1,84,929 1<br />

Lacs+<br />

1,79,478 1<br />

Lacs+<br />

1,79,078 1<br />

Lacs+<br />

6448%<br />

Data <strong>in</strong> this Kit is presented <strong>in</strong> good faith, with an <strong>in</strong>tention to <strong>in</strong>form voters. Candidates' affidavit with nom<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

papers is the source <strong>of</strong> this analysis. www.adr<strong>in</strong>dia.org, http://www.myneta.<strong>in</strong>fo, adr@adr<strong>in</strong>dia.org,<br />

http://www.twitter.com/adrspeaks, http://www.facebook.com/adr.new<br />

170%<br />

247%<br />

10%<br />

17%<br />

420%<br />

72%<br />

2556%<br />

5%<br />

20%<br />

8%<br />

38%<br />

Page 12 <strong>of</strong> 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!