Asset Comparison of Re-contesting MLAs in West Bengal 2011 ...
Asset Comparison of Re-contesting MLAs in West Bengal 2011 ...
Asset Comparison of Re-contesting MLAs in West Bengal 2011 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60 JIBAN<br />
PRAKASH<br />
SAHA<br />
61 SAKUNTALA<br />
PAIK<br />
62 Asish<br />
Banerjee<br />
63 Tajmul<br />
Hossa<strong>in</strong><br />
64 MILAN<br />
CHANDRA<br />
PARUA<br />
65 PRANAB<br />
KUMAR<br />
BHATTACHA<br />
RYYA<br />
66 BIVAS<br />
CHAKRABO<br />
RTY<br />
67 Mafuja<br />
Khatun<br />
68 ABUL<br />
HASNAT<br />
69 Sunil<br />
Adhikari<br />
70 Kshiti<br />
Goswami<br />
71 BHUTNATH<br />
SAREN<br />
AIFB AIFB SHYAMPUK<br />
UR<br />
Shyampukur 22,01,839 2<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
CPI(M) CPI(M) KULPI Kulpi 20,09,000 2<br />
0 Lacs+<br />
AITC AITC RAMPURHA<br />
T<br />
AIFB AIFB HARISCHAN<br />
DRA-PUR<br />
Rampurhat 35,75,914 3<br />
5 Lacs+<br />
Harishchandrap<br />
ur<br />
34,36,784 3<br />
4 Lacs+<br />
CPI(M) CPI(M) SAGAR Sagar 23,01,462 2<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
CPI(M) CPI(M) Habra Habra 19,99,763 1<br />
9 Lacs+<br />
AIFB AIFB MURSHIDA<br />
BAD<br />
CPI(M) CPI(M) KUMARGAN<br />
J<br />
RSP RSP RAGHUNAT<br />
HGANJ<br />
Murshidabad 12,70,418 1<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
Kumarganj 14,75,891 1<br />
4 Lacs+<br />
Jangipur 44,47,560 4<br />
4 Lacs+<br />
CPI(M) CPI(M) DASPUR Daspur 29,41,891 2<br />
9 Lacs+<br />
RSP RSP ALIPURDUA<br />
RS<br />
CPI(M) CPI(M) NAYAGRAM<br />
(ST)<br />
Dhakuria 24,40,438 2<br />
4 Lacs+<br />
Nayagram 13,30,225 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
8,10,569<br />
8 Lacs+<br />
6,19,962<br />
6 Lacs+<br />
22,00,606<br />
22 Lacs+<br />
20,70,618<br />
20 Lacs+<br />
9,62,437<br />
9 Lacs+<br />
6,67,954<br />
6 Lacs+<br />
1,475 1 T<br />
hou+<br />
2,09,236<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
31,81,826<br />
31 Lacs+<br />
16,96,265<br />
16 Lacs+<br />
11,98,638<br />
11 Lacs+<br />
1,39,300<br />
1 Lacs+<br />
13,91,270 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
13,89,038 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
13,75,308 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
13,66,166 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
13,39,025 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
13,31,809 1<br />
3 Lacs+<br />
12,68,943 1<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
12,66,655 1<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
12,65,734 1<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
12,45,626 1<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
12,41,800 1<br />
2 Lacs+<br />
11,90,925 1<br />
1 Lacs+<br />
Data <strong>in</strong> this Kit is presented <strong>in</strong> good faith, with an <strong>in</strong>tention to <strong>in</strong>form voters. Candidates' affidavit with nom<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
papers is the source <strong>of</strong> this analysis. www.adr<strong>in</strong>dia.org, http://www.myneta.<strong>in</strong>fo, adr@adr<strong>in</strong>dia.org,<br />
http://www.twitter.com/adrspeaks, http://www.facebook.com/adr.new<br />
172%<br />
224%<br />
62%<br />
66%<br />
139%<br />
199%<br />
86030%<br />
605%<br />
40%<br />
73%<br />
104%<br />
855%<br />
Page 8 <strong>of</strong> 15
Change language