29.06.2013 Views

Oral History of Robert Everett - Computer History Museum

Oral History of Robert Everett - Computer History Museum

Oral History of Robert Everett - Computer History Museum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hendrie: We have to pause now. And we want to continue from that comment.<br />

END OF TAPE FOUR<br />

Hendrie: You just had mentioned the joke about using SAGE for air traffic control.<br />

<strong>Oral</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Everett</strong><br />

<strong>Everett</strong>: So anyway, there was some effort in that direction and that led into other things, to work for the<br />

FAA. At first it was all done for the Air Force. But after awhile, it transferred, and we worked directly for<br />

the FAA, and that's been going on ever since. We, in addition to holding the SAGE's hand and modifying<br />

it and improving it, there was the Super-SAGE thing to work on. And the SAC used some Super-SAGE<br />

Q32s, I think they were, the transistorized SAGE machines for managing the <strong>of</strong>fensive business. We did<br />

some work on that. Then other things came up, the virtues <strong>of</strong> having a computer, a digital general-purpose<br />

computer, in the middle <strong>of</strong> these command and control systems was obvious to people. So people started<br />

building those things, and we gradually started picking up work for different people in the Air Force and<br />

others. It just grew from there. I used to think <strong>of</strong> it as a two-dimensional matrix: in one dimension were the<br />

particular technical skills that you had, and in the other direction were the particular skills that you had in<br />

the applications. So if you had Air Force Air Defense Command with the technology that we had for that,<br />

you could move over and do something else for the Air Force and fill that in. Or you could take some <strong>of</strong><br />

the technologies you developed for the Air Defense Command and go pick some new sponsor. So by<br />

moving in this exact fashion you could gradually fill this whole matrix. And we've done pretty well at that.<br />

Hendrie: Do you think the FAA would have ended up with more success in their air traffic control system<br />

if they'd adopted the SAGE system even though it looked incredibly expensive at the time, considering the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> money they've spent since then?<br />

<strong>Everett</strong>: I doubt it.<br />

Hendrie: Just wasn't applicable enough.<br />

<strong>Everett</strong>: I think we did air traffic control out <strong>of</strong> a SAGE sector up in the North. And it worked. It could<br />

have been done. But the technology was moving rapidly enough so they really made you start over.<br />

Hendrie: Okay. I know you read a lot about the difficulties the FAA has had managing their…<br />

<strong>Everett</strong>: I thought you were going to say, “Would they have been better <strong>of</strong>f without the MITRE's help?” I<br />

could never say that.<br />

CHM Ref: X3877.2007 © 2007 <strong>Computer</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>Museum</strong> Page 49 <strong>of</strong> 56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!