Achieving Successful Cross-Cultural and Management Integration ...
Achieving Successful Cross-Cultural and Management Integration ...
Achieving Successful Cross-Cultural and Management Integration ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Achieving</strong> <strong>Successful</strong> <strong>Cross</strong>-<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Integration</strong>: The Experience of Lenovo <strong>and</strong> IBM<br />
By Sharona Peng<br />
the organization to take advantage of its strength (e.g. Diversity) <strong>and</strong> thus to be<br />
competitive. Some scholars have emphasized the differences in national <strong>and</strong> corporate<br />
cultures which make difficult for international M&A to integrate (Sales <strong>and</strong> Mirvis,<br />
1984; Buono, Bowditch <strong>and</strong> Lewis, 1985), <strong>and</strong> thus bear a high level of failure rate.<br />
But culture can be a competitive advantage of a company which may bring new<br />
opportunity for the company. If management can actively be involved in learning the<br />
culture of others, it will increase organisation’s ability to adapt to its environment,<br />
look at problem-solving <strong>and</strong> decision-making from different perspectives <strong>and</strong> become<br />
more flexible in its management style for its employees worldwide.<br />
In order to achieve this synergy, the organisation should rest on the premise that to<br />
respect other’s culture while creating a new culture for the companies that is suitable<br />
for its employees from both acquiring <strong>and</strong> acquired company. Therefore, while<br />
fostering a new culture, the acquiring company should find an integration mode that it<br />
is suitable for the company <strong>and</strong> not simply try to transfer its culture to its acquired<br />
company.<br />
2.9 Mode of <strong>Integration</strong><br />
As Nahav<strong>and</strong>i <strong>and</strong> Malekzadeh (1988) proposed, the degree of congruence between<br />
the acquirer <strong>and</strong> acquired organisations’ preferred modes of acculturation will affect<br />
the level of acculturative stress. Acculturation is generally defined as “changes<br />
induced in two culture systems as a result of the diffusion of cultural elements in both<br />
directions” (Berry, 1980, p. 215). Scholars have identified four modes through which<br />
acculturation takes place (Berry, 1983; Berry, 1984; Pan, 2006). These include<br />
integration, assimilation, separation <strong>and</strong> deculturation. The modes are used to define<br />
ways in which two groups adapt to each other <strong>and</strong> resolve emergent conflicts. In the<br />
case of M&A, the characteristic of the acquired <strong>and</strong> acquiring companies will<br />
determine which mode of acculturation will be triggered (Nahav<strong>and</strong>i <strong>and</strong> Malekzadeh,<br />
1988).<br />
30 / 78