Achieving Successful Cross-Cultural and Management Integration ...
Achieving Successful Cross-Cultural and Management Integration ...
Achieving Successful Cross-Cultural and Management Integration ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Achieving</strong> <strong>Successful</strong> <strong>Cross</strong>-<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Integration</strong>: The Experience of Lenovo <strong>and</strong> IBM<br />
By Sharona Peng<br />
preserve one’s culture <strong>and</strong> practices by remaining separate <strong>and</strong> independent from the<br />
dominant group (Berry, 1983). This mode is likely to take place when members of the<br />
acquired firm want to preserve their culture <strong>and</strong> organizational systems so they refuse<br />
to become assimilated into the acquiring team in any way or at any level (Nahav<strong>and</strong>i<br />
<strong>and</strong> Malekzadeh, 1988; Pan, 2006). According to Nahav<strong>and</strong>i <strong>and</strong> Malekzadeh (1988),<br />
these members will resist any attempt to adopt <strong>and</strong> conciliate, <strong>and</strong> they will try to<br />
remain totally separate from the acquiring team. If that is allowed by the acquiring<br />
company, they will function as a separate unit under the financial umbrella of the<br />
parent company. In short, there will be minimal cultural exchange between the two<br />
teams, <strong>and</strong> each will function independently (Nahav<strong>and</strong>i <strong>and</strong> Malekzadeh, 1988).<br />
Deculturation<br />
The last mode of acculturation is deculturation which involves losing cultural <strong>and</strong><br />
psychological contact with either groups or the other group. In addition, it also<br />
involves remaining an outcast to both (Sales & Mirvis, 1984). This occurs when<br />
members of the acquired firm neither value their own culture, organisational practices<br />
<strong>and</strong> system, nor they want to be assimilated into the acquiring team. As Berry (1983)<br />
suggests, factors that leads to this mode may include individuals from acquired<br />
company suffering from alienation <strong>and</strong> lose of identity. As a result, the acquired team<br />
is likely to disintegrate as a cultural identity.<br />
In summary, the concepts of acculturation discussed above have addressed the ways<br />
in which the acquired <strong>and</strong> acquiring company can use to integrate cultures,<br />
organisational systems <strong>and</strong> practices of both companies. A total absorption of one into<br />
another is by no means the only mode of adaptation. The mode of acculturation<br />
depends on the way in which the acquiring <strong>and</strong> acquired company approaches the<br />
implementation of the merger. From the acquired company’s point of view, the degree<br />
to which members want to preserve their own culture <strong>and</strong> organisational practices <strong>and</strong><br />
the degree to which they are willing to adopt the acquirer’s culture <strong>and</strong> practices will<br />
determine their preferred mode of acculturation (Nahav<strong>and</strong>i <strong>and</strong> Malekzadeh, 1988).<br />
32 / 78