30.06.2013 Views

Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences

Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences

Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

590 Elwell<br />

refrigerated overnight. The resultant precipitate was pelleted by centrifugation <strong>and</strong> gently resuspended<br />

in a small volume of b-galactosidase assay buffer. This assay buffer contains a final<br />

concentration of 0.4 mM dithiethreitol (DTT). The reducing agent, DTT, is necessary to<br />

disrupt disulfide bonds, <strong>the</strong>reby disaggregating b-galactosidase into its constituent,<br />

enzymatically active monomers. The tetrameric form of this large enzyme (465,412 Da)<br />

would be excluded from conventional polyacrylamide gels. The suspension was exhaustively<br />

dialyzed against multiple exchanges of assay buffer <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> resultant “mud”colored<br />

suspension was transferred to a clean tube or small bottle <strong>and</strong> refrigerated until fur<strong>the</strong>r use.<br />

ENZYME PURIFICATION USING GEL-FILTRATION<br />

CHROMATOGRAPHY<br />

General Considerations<br />

Chromatography is <strong>the</strong> technique of choice for high-resolution purification. These<br />

methods, normally involving glass columns containing chromatographic media, are<br />

universally used for <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>and</strong> purification of protein preparations. In<br />

choosing <strong>the</strong> appropriate chromatographic technique a number of considerations must be<br />

taken into account. For protein products <strong>the</strong>se factors include molecular mass, isoelectric<br />

point, hydrophobicity <strong>and</strong> inherent biological affinities. Each of <strong>the</strong>se properties can be<br />

usefully exploited by specific chromatographic methods that may be scaled-up for use in<br />

an industrial unit-process context.<br />

Choice of Matrix<br />

As discussed earlier, one of <strong>the</strong> chief limitations of gel-filtration chromatography is that<br />

<strong>the</strong> separation may be slow <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> resolution of <strong>the</strong> emerging peaks is limited.<br />

Resolution is limited because proteins do not bind to <strong>the</strong> matrix. As a consequence,<br />

<strong>the</strong> column matrix for gel-filtration must be chosen with great care to insure <strong>the</strong> best<br />

resolved separation of <strong>the</strong> target macromolecule from contaminants. The matrix should<br />

be chosen so that <strong>the</strong> molecular weight of <strong>the</strong> target protein falls near <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong><br />

matrix fractionation range. The fractionation range defines <strong>the</strong> approximate protein or<br />

peptide molecular weights that can be separated with that particular chromatography<br />

medium. Tables 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 provide information pertinent to <strong>the</strong> selection of column media.<br />

Sephacryl-Hr Gel-Filtration Matrices<br />

For this experiment Sephacryl HR (high resolution) medium has been chosen. As shown<br />

in Table 1, this particular gel filtration matrix is a cross-linked copolymer of allyl dextran<br />

<strong>and</strong> N, N-methylenebisacrylamide. According to Pharmacia, <strong>the</strong> narrow particle size<br />

distribution of this medium, toge<strong>the</strong>r with its steep selectivity curve, make Sephacryl HR<br />

resolution matrices particularly useful for routine separations, especially when dealing<br />

with relatively large amounts of crude sample.<br />

Sephacryl 300-HR was chosen for two specific reasons. First, <strong>the</strong> molecular weight<br />

of <strong>the</strong> b-galactosidase monomer (116,000 Da) fell within <strong>the</strong> fractionation range of this<br />

matrix (10–1500 kDa). The second reason was that Craven et al. (1965) had reported <strong>the</strong><br />

efficient purification of E. coli b-galactosidase using a Sephadex G-200 column; <strong>the</strong><br />

fractionation range for Sephadex G-200 is close to that of Sephacryl 300-HR (Table 2).<br />

The large size of our target protein was advantageous with respect to its ultimate<br />

purification. Because of <strong>the</strong> relatively low resolution power of gel-filtration

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!