Th`ese de Doctorat de l'université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie Mlle ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

List of Publications [1] A. Capone, J. Elias, F. Martignon, and G. Pujolle, “Dynamic Resource Allocation in Communication Networks,” in Proceedings of Networking 2006, Coimbra, Portugal, 15-19 May, 2006, also published in Springer LNCS, Vol. 3976, pp. 892-903, 2006. [2] A. Capone, J. Elias, F. Martignon, and G. Pujolle, “Distributed Dynamic Resource Allocation in Quality of Service Networks,” in Springer LNCS, Vol. 3383, January, 2006. [3] A. Capone, J. Elias, F. Martignon, and G. Pujolle, “Distributed Dynamic Bandwidth Provisioning in Quality of Service Networks,” in Proceedings of Third EuroNGI Work- shop on QoS and Traffic Control, ENS, Paris, France, 7-9 December, 2005. [4] A. Capone, J. Elias, F. Martignon, and G. Pujolle, “Distributed Dynamic Resource Allocation in Quality of Service Networks,” in Second EuroNGI Workshop on New Trends in Network Architectures and Services, Como, Italy, 13-15 July, 2005. [5] J. Elias and D. Gaïti, “Contrôle de MPLS par l’utilisation des Systèmes Multiagents,” in DNAC-PARIS’04, Paris, France, Novembre-Décembre, 2004. [6] J. Elias, D. Gaïti, and G. Pujolle, “Optimisation du Protocole MPLS par l’utilisation des Systèmes Multiagents,” in Proceedings of 6èmes Journées Doctorales Informatique et Réseau (JDIR’04), Lannion,FranceTélécom R&D, France, 2-4 Novembre, 2004.
Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors Professors Guy Pujolle and Dominique Gaïti for their support and guidance during my PhD studies at “Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris 6” (LIP6), “Pierre et Marie Curie” University. I will always appreciate their cheerful encouragement over these three years. I would also like to thank Professors Tijani Chahed, Walid Dabbous, Luigi Fratta, Fabio Martignon and Samir Tohmé for accepting to be part of my Thesis Jury. I would like to express my sincere thanks to Mr. Charles Tabet at Scientific National Research Council in Lebanon (CNRS-Lebanon) for supporting me to accomplish my PhD studies. I would also like to thank all the members of CNRS-Lebanon for attributing me during three years a ‘Bourse’ for PhD studies. I am particularly grateful to Prof. Antonio Capone, Prof. Luigi Fratta and Mr. Fabio Martignon for my research visit at ANTLab Laboratory at Politecnico di Milano. In particular, I would like to thank Mr. Fabio Martignon for collaborating with me on several valuable ideas. I want to thank all of my colleagues and friends at LIP6. Especially, I thank our secretary, Laetitia Jacquey, for her patience and willingness to provide us, when it is possible, all that we need. This thesis is dedicated to my family, to my parents on both sides and to all my village. There is a long list of people to thank. All contributed in one way or another to this thesis. To them all - I am eternally thankful.
Page 1 and 2: Thèse de Doctorat de l’universit
Page 3 and 4: To my family.
Page 5: Abstract Efficient dynamic resource
Page 10 and 11: 4.2 Connections Classification . .
Page 13 and 14: Résumé delaThèse 1. La probléma
Page 15 and 16: supérieure sur les performances qu
Page 17 and 18: compte les fonctions d’utilité d
Page 19 and 20: (Policy Decision Point), d’un ens
Page 21 and 22: ligne pour individualiser la bande
Page 23 and 24: 6. Nous proposons trois algorithmes
Page 25 and 26: appelons débit de crête. Six sour
Page 27 and 28: 6. Conclusion générale et Perspec
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1 Introduction The Internet
Page 31 and 32: upper bounds to the performance ach
Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2 Dynamic Bandwidth Allocat
Page 35 and 36: Utility Function Types In a multi-a
Page 37 and 38: comes smaller than the application
Page 39 and 40: of which there exist extensive theo
Page 41 and 42: allows us to allocate the bandwidth
Page 43: Shenker in [10] states that the net
Page 46 and 47: implements such service model by pe
Page 48 and 49: considering different constraints l
Page 50 and 51: 4.1 Problem Statement Let us model
Page 52 and 53: y all network users. Using the nota
Page 54 and 55: in the following Section. The struc
Page 56 and 57:
Optimum Bandwidth Allocation Algori
Page 58 and 59:
Table 5.1: Pseudo-code specificatio
Page 60 and 61:
of all greedy connections that are
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 6 Mathematical Model This C
Page 65 and 66:
1 2 3 4 0000000000 1111111111 00000
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 7 Numerical Results The mai
Page 69 and 70:
the two core nodes is equal to 6 Mb
Page 71 and 72:
Total Accepted Load (Mb/s) 6 5.5 5
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
plottedinFigure7.9. Figures 7.10 an
Page 77 and 78:
Total Accepted Load (Mb/s) 6 5 4 3
Page 79 and 80:
S 2 S 3 S 4 1 S 6 S1 S5 2 3 4 5 D 1
Page 81 and 82:
high network loads, where it achiev
Page 83 and 84:
proposed allocation algorithms in a
Page 85 and 86:
Table 7.3: Peak rate, subscribed ra
Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8 Performance Upper Bound T
Page 89 and 90:
Table 8.1: Average performance gain
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Total Accepted Load (Mb/s) 6 5 4 3
Page 95 and 96:
Chapter 9 Conclusion 9.1 Discussion
Page 97:
established by creating a session i
Page 100 and 101:
[7] F. P. Kelly, “Charging and ra
Page 102 and 103:
[26] P. Reichl, S. Leinen, and B. S
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix A Algorithm Implementation
Page 107 and 108:
these latters are implemented using
Page 109 and 110:
• boolean State: the connection s
Page 111 and 112:
(CSTtable) is updated by the ingres
Page 113 and 114:
Table A.2: Java code for updating t
Page 115 and 116:
List of Acronyms ACA Autonomous Com
Page 117 and 118:
List of Figures 1 Notre architectur
Page 119 and 120:
8.1 Performance upper bound for all
Page 121:
List of Tables 5.1 Pseudo-code spec
show all

Th`ese de Doctorat de l'université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie Mlle ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?