Lexically conditioned variation in Harmonic Grammar

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Analysis of probabilistic lexical conditioning Constraint for e-deletion with preceding consonant-final word: (35) *C.C. An unlicensed consonant must be preceded by a vowel Probability of deletion in learning data: (36) la semaineL1 50% quelle semaineL1 10% le semestreL2 10% quel semestreL2 0% le bretonL3 0% quel bretonL3 0% la belonL4 0% quelle belonL4 0% The markedness constraints again started out at 50, and the five faithfulness constraints (MAX, MAXL1...4) at zero
The constraint weights found by the learner: (37) *[ә] 50.3 LICENSE-C 49.7 MAX-belon 15.0 *C.C. 4.9 MAX-semestre 4.8 MAX-breton 0.0 MAX –0.3 MAX-semaine –20.1 Deletion rates: (38) la semaine 52% quelle semaine 10% le semestre 11% quel semestre 1% le breton 0% quel breton 0% la belon 0% quelle belon 0% әCVC 100% CVәCVC 100%
Page 1 and 2: OCP-5, Toulouse-Le Mirail, 01-26-08
Page 3 and 4: Lexically conditioned variation is
Page 5 and 6: However, since speakers do at least
Page 7 and 8: 1. HG, variation, exceptionality, a
Page 9 and 10: Boersma’s (1997 et seq.) theory o
Page 11 and 12: In HG, the difference between the C
Page 13 and 14: To account for exceptions to e-dele
Page 15 and 16: The HG-GLA is a very simple learnin
Page 17 and 18: The grammar model was run in Linear
Page 19 and 20: In general, schwa deletion is block
Page 21 and 22: Dell (1973) notes that exceptions t
Page 23 and 24: Racine’s (2007, in prep.) judgmen
Page 25: elon -5.4 semestre -4.6 semaine 0.0
Page 29 and 30: (39) *[ә] LIC-C MAX /sәmɛn/ 1 2.
Page 31 and 32: 5. Broader consequences of lexicall
Page 33 and 34: The fine-grained lexical conditioni
Page 35 and 36: Boersma, Paul and David Weenink. 20
Page 37 and 38: Cooperative Research Report 3288. V

Lexically conditioned variation in Harmonic Grammar

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?