Lexically conditioned variation in Harmonic Grammar

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fidelholtz, J. 1975. Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. In CLS, 11:200-213. Fougeron, Cécile and Steriade, Donca. (1997). Does the deletion of French schwa lead to the neutralization of lexical distinctions? Proceedings of the Eurospeech conference, Rhodes. 943–946. Goldrick, Matt. 2008. A harmonic grammar account of lexically-conditioned phonetic variation. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting. Chicago. Hansen, A. 1994. Etude du E caduc—stabilisation en cours et variations lexicales. Journal of French Language Studies 4: 25-54. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. In In-Seok Yang, ed. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin. p. 1-91. Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 2:85-138. Kiparsky, Paul. 1993. An OT perspective on phonological variation. Handout from Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1993, also presented at NWAV 1994, Stanford University. Available at http://www.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/ Papers/nwave94.pdf Labov, William, P. Cohen, C. Robins and J. Lewis. 1968. A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City.
Cooperative Research Report 3288. Vols I and II. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey (Linguistics Laboratory, U. of Pa.) Legendre, Géraldine, Yoshiro Miyata and Paul Smolensky. 1990. Can connectionism contribute to syntax? Harmonic Grammar, with an application. In M. Ziolkowski, M. Noske and K. Deaton, eds. Proceedings of the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. p. 237-252. Martinet, A. 1969. Le français sans fard. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Oostendorp, Marc van. 1997. Style Levels in Conflict Resolution. In Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels, eds. Variation, Change and Phonological Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. p. 207-229. Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology, 17:237-274. [Published version of 1995 ms. available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-107.] Pater, Joe. 2008. Gradual learning and convergence. Linguistic Inquiry 39. [Available at http://people.umass.edu/pater/pater-gradual-converge.pdf.] Pater, Joe, Rajesh Bhatt and Christopher Potts. 2007. Linguistic Optimization. Manuscript. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst. [Available at http://people.umass.edu/pater/pater-bhatt-potts-hg07.pdf.] Phillips, Betty S. 2006. Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Page 1 and 2: OCP-5, Toulouse-Le Mirail, 01-26-08
Page 3 and 4: Lexically conditioned variation is
Page 5 and 6: However, since speakers do at least
Page 7 and 8: 1. HG, variation, exceptionality, a
Page 9 and 10: Boersma’s (1997 et seq.) theory o
Page 11 and 12: In HG, the difference between the C
Page 13 and 14: To account for exceptions to e-dele
Page 15 and 16: The HG-GLA is a very simple learnin
Page 17 and 18: The grammar model was run in Linear
Page 19 and 20: In general, schwa deletion is block
Page 21 and 22: Dell (1973) notes that exceptions t
Page 23 and 24: Racine’s (2007, in prep.) judgmen
Page 25 and 26: elon -5.4 semestre -4.6 semaine 0.0
Page 27 and 28: The constraint weights found by the
Page 29 and 30: (39) *[ә] LIC-C MAX /sәmɛn/ 1 2.
Page 31 and 32: 5. Broader consequences of lexicall
Page 33 and 34: The fine-grained lexical conditioni
Page 35: Boersma, Paul and David Weenink. 20

Lexically conditioned variation in Harmonic Grammar

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?