02.07.2013 Views

Growth and physical properties of crystalline rubrene - BOA Bicocca ...

Growth and physical properties of crystalline rubrene - BOA Bicocca ...

Growth and physical properties of crystalline rubrene - BOA Bicocca ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Sample characterization 37<br />

Figure 3.8: Contact mode AFM image <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> a (3 × 3) µm 2 region <strong>of</strong><br />

a <strong>rubrene</strong> thin film grown on top <strong>of</strong> a <strong>rubrene</strong> single crystal. (a) Height image<br />

in which lighter grays correspond to higher regions <strong>of</strong> the surface. (b) Deflection<br />

image collected on the same region, in which the grays scale is used to represent<br />

the cantilever deflection in each point.<br />

a value such that, during each oscillation, the tip passes from a non-contact<br />

regime to a contact regime, <strong>and</strong> then back to a non-contact regime.<br />

Variations in the average tip-sample distance lead to variations <strong>of</strong> the root<br />

mean square (RMS) oscillation amplitude <strong>of</strong> the cantilever. Thus, if during<br />

the scanning the tip encounters a valley or a protrusion on the sample sur-<br />

face there is a variation in the RMS oscillation amplitude <strong>of</strong> the cantilever.<br />

In analogy with what happens for contact-mode measurements, the feed-<br />

back circuit restores the initial oscillation amplitude by varying the vertical<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> the scanner. A morphological image <strong>of</strong> the surface can then<br />

be reconstructed by assigning to each image pixel the corresponding value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the scanner vertical extension. Height <strong>and</strong> amplitude images collected<br />

in tapping mode would look exactly like the height <strong>and</strong> deflection images<br />

reported in figure 3.8 <strong>and</strong> collected in contact mode.<br />

Since in tapping mode the AFM tip is in contact with sample surface<br />

only in the lowest point <strong>of</strong> the cantilever oscillation, the duration <strong>of</strong> the tip-<br />

sample interaction is minimized with respect to contact mode. This leads to<br />

the main advantage <strong>of</strong> tapping mode over contact mode measurements, i.e.<br />

minimum sample damage due to tip-sample interactions.<br />

During the scanning <strong>of</strong> a surface in tapping mode it is also possible<br />

to collect phase-contrast images, in addition to height images, constructed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!