12.10.2012 Views

CDP-FTSE-350-Climate-Change-Report-2012

CDP-FTSE-350-Climate-Change-Report-2012

CDP-FTSE-350-Climate-Change-Report-2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26<br />

CPLI<br />

T3 THE <strong>CDP</strong> <strong>FTSE</strong> <strong>350</strong> CPLI <strong>2012</strong><br />

Disclosure<br />

Sector Company<br />

Consumer Discretionary Marks & Spencer 81 A No<br />

Consumer Staples Diageo 98 A Yes<br />

The criteria to enter the CPLI was more stringent in <strong>2012</strong>:<br />

companies had to obtain a performance score above<br />

85, achieve at least a 3% reduction in carbon emissions<br />

as a result of emissions reduction activities over the last<br />

year and disclose and verify Scope 1 and 2 emissions.<br />

All companies in the <strong>2012</strong> CPLI are new to the index,<br />

however six of the seven are also in the CDLI.<br />

In addition to showing high levels of disclosure, companies<br />

are showing leadership by implementing actions. Figure<br />

11 shows how CPLI companies are strongly outperforming<br />

non-CPLI companies in a number of areas.<br />

CPLI companies are already, without exception, disclosing<br />

details of their greenhouse gas emissions in public<br />

reports, with the vast majority (86%) choosing to put<br />

this information in their annual reports. The leaders are<br />

therefore well placed to adapt to the Government’s new<br />

reporting requirements without significantly needing<br />

to modify their business processes. In addition, in<br />

Score <strong>2012</strong><br />

Performance<br />

Band<br />

Also in the<br />

CDLI?<br />

Reckitt Benckiser 93 A Yes<br />

Unilever 84 A Yes<br />

Industrials Morgan Crucible 86 A Yes<br />

Materials Anglo American 94 A Yes<br />

Mondi 88 A Yes<br />

accordance with the CPLI entry requirements, 100%<br />

of the CPLI verify both their Scope 1 & 2 emissions<br />

(non-CPLI: 32%).<br />

F11 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN CPLI AND NON-CPLI COMPANIES<br />

• CPLI • All<br />

• Non-CPLI<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

100%<br />

97%<br />

97%<br />

Higher Level<br />

governance<br />

100%<br />

55%<br />

Integrated<br />

strategy<br />

56%<br />

100%<br />

57%<br />

45%<br />

Monetary<br />

incentives<br />

100%<br />

67%<br />

66%<br />

Implementation<br />

of emissions<br />

reduction targets<br />

All CPLI companies are setting absolute and intensity<br />

targets to monitor progress: 57% of CPLI companies have<br />

absolute targets (non-CPLI: 32%) and 71% have intensity<br />

targets (non-CPLI: 36%). CPLI companies are not only<br />

setting and disclosing targets but, importantly, are working<br />

towards meeting them. CPLI companies are meeting their<br />

targets faster than the non-CPLI respondents: 86% of<br />

CPLI companies have met or are ahead of their targets<br />

(non-CPLI: 43%).<br />

By already integrating climate change into their<br />

mainstream business processes, the vast majority of<br />

leading companies are ideally placed to meet future<br />

reporting requirements and are at the forefront of driving<br />

the change in the business as usual approach to adapting<br />

to a sustainable future.<br />

88%<br />

43%<br />

Progress<br />

meeting<br />

targets<br />

61%<br />

100%<br />

53%<br />

54%<br />

Emissions<br />

reductions from<br />

initiatives<br />

86%<br />

53%<br />

54%<br />

<strong>Report</strong> <strong>Climate</strong><br />

<strong>Change</strong> in annual<br />

reports<br />

100%<br />

32%<br />

31%<br />

Verification or<br />

assurance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!