insanity.pdf

Africa 19
arguing that Emma cannot be held criminally responsible on nonpathological
grounds. Construct an argument to support your claim that
she was unable to exercise volitional control because she was
overwhelmed by rage. Draw on case law to support your argument and
suggest how psychological evidence may assist your case.
References
Allen, M. J. (1995). Textbook on Criminal Law. London : Blackstone Press Limited.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders-TR (Fourth edition Revised).
Barnard, P. G. (1998). Diminished capacity and automatism as a defence. American
Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16(2), 27- 62.
Boister, N. (1996). Recent cases : general principles of liability. South African Journal of
Criminal Justice, 9(3), 371-374.
Burchell, J. (1995). Non-pathological incapacity: evaluation of psychiatric testimony. South
African Journal of Criminal Justice, 8(1), 37-42.
Burchell, J. M. (1997). South African Criminal Law and Procedure Vol 1: General Principles
of Criminal Law. (Third edition) Cape Town: Juta.
Card, R. (1992). Criminal Law. London : Butterworths.
Clarkson, C. M.. V. and Keating, H. M. (1990). Criminal Law : Texts and materials. London
: Sweet and Maxwell.
Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977.
Criminal Matters Amendment Act 68 of 1998.
Dershowitz, A (1994). The Abuse Excuse and other cop–outs, sob-stories and evasions of
responsibility. New York : Free Press.
Finkel, N. J. (1988). Insanity on trial. New York: Plenum Press.
Gillmer, B. (1996). Psycho-legal incoherence. Paper presented to the National Congress of the
South African Psychological Society. Johannesburg, September 1996.
Kruger, A. (1980). Mental health law in South Africa. Durban: Butterworths.
Kruger, A. (1999). Accused: Capacity to understand proceedings: Mental illness and criminal
responsibility. In E. Du Toit, F. De Jager, A. Paizes, A. Skeen& S. van der Merwe(eds.).
Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act (Service 22). Cape Town: Juta.
Rollin, H (1977). ‘McNaughton’s madness’. In D. West and A.Walk (eds). Daniel
McNaughton: His trial and the aftermath. Kent: Gaskell Books.
Petty, C. (1998). The psychopathology of self-control. Unpublished MA thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
Reed, A. and Seago, P. (1999). Criminal Law. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Rumpff, (1990). Feite of woorde. Consultus, 3 (1), 19-22.
R v Harris 1965 (2) SA 340 (A)
S v Arnold 1985 (3) SA 256 (C)
S v Campher 1987 (1) SA 940 (A)
S v Kavin 1978 (2) SA 731 (W)
S v Laubscher 1988 (1) S A 163 (A)
S v Mahlinza 1967 (1) SA 408 (A)
S v Moses 1996 (1) SACR 701 (C)
S v Pederson 1998 3 All SA 321
S v Potgieter 1994 (1) SACR 61 (A)
S v Wiid 1990 (1) SACR 561 (A)
Schopp, R. F. (1991). Automatism, insanity and the psychology of criminal responsibility: A
philosophical enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slovenko, R. (1995) Psychiatry and criminal culpability. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Snyman, C. R. (1989). Die verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid in
die strafreg. Tydskrif vir Regswetenskap, 14(1), 1-15.
Snyman, C. R. (1991). Provokasie as volkome verweer in die Strafreg. Consultus, 4(1),35-38.
Snyman, C. R. ( 2002). Criminal Law. (Fourth edition). Durban: Butterworths.
Steadman H., McGreevy, M., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. and Cirincone, C. (1993). Before and
after Hinckley: evaluating insanity defence reform. New York: Guilford Press.