05.07.2013 Views

Morphing Moonlight: Gender, masks and carnival mayhem- The ...

Morphing Moonlight: Gender, masks and carnival mayhem- The ...

Morphing Moonlight: Gender, masks and carnival mayhem- The ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

forms or bodies. <strong>The</strong> Dionysian, being formless <strong>and</strong> transgressing<br />

boundaries, st<strong>and</strong>s in opposition to this Apolline structure. This opposition<br />

ensures that states of existence do not stultify or congeal. Apollo is the god<br />

of illusion <strong>and</strong> dream, who hides the reality of humankind’s miserable<br />

existence. Nietzsche sees culture as the ultimate illusion created by the<br />

Apollonian. <strong>The</strong> Dionysian constantly tears at the veil of illusion, but the<br />

Apollonian continually reasserts control, allowing illusion to reassert itself.<br />

Nietzsche believed that if humankind were exposed to the truth that the<br />

Dionysian contains that the terrifying nature of this truth would cause instant<br />

insanity. <strong>The</strong> interplay of the Apollonian <strong>and</strong> the Dionysian creates a<br />

constant cycle of transgression of boundaries, change, absorption <strong>and</strong><br />

reaffirmation of boundaries. As Foucault indicated in his writing on<br />

transgression:<br />

<strong>The</strong> limit <strong>and</strong> transgression depend on each other for whatever<br />

density of being they possess: a limit could not exist if it were<br />

absolutely uncrossable <strong>and</strong>, reciprocally, transgression would be<br />

pointless if it merely crossed a limit composed of illusions <strong>and</strong><br />

shadows. (Foucault 1998: 73) 2<br />

For Foucault, transgression <strong>and</strong> the limit are interrelated, though not in a<br />

system of dualism, but rather ‘their relationship takes the form of a spiral<br />

that no simple infraction can exhaust’ (Foucault 1998: 74).<br />

2 La limite et la transgression se doivent l’une à l’autre la densité de leur être: inexistence d’une limite<br />

qui ne pourrait absolument pas être franchie; vanité en retour d’une transgression qui ne franchirait<br />

qu’une limite d’illusion ou d’ombre. (Michel Foucault, Dits et Ecrits 1, «Préface à la Transgression». p.<br />

265).<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!