12.07.2013 Views

Paradise Restored

David Chilton

David Chilton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ls<br />

THE DAY OF THE LORD<br />

One of the greatest interpretive mistakes made by Bible<br />

students is the assumption that the Bible cannot use the same expression,<br />

such as “Coming,“ in different senses. Much of the<br />

present book has been written to refute that basic error. As we<br />

have seen, God “came in the clouds” on numerous occasions in<br />

Scripture, and collapsing-universe terminology is used to<br />

describe several different historical events. Once we understand<br />

this, however, we seem to be presented with a different problem:<br />

What about the Second Coming of Christ? Since so many<br />

prophecies turn out to be references to the destruction of<br />

Jerusalem in A.D. 70, how can we be sure that any prophecy<br />

refers to a future, literal return of Jesus Christ?<br />

There are several ways to approach this question. One fruitful<br />

method is to examine a common Biblical expression for<br />

“Judgment Day”: lhe Day of the Lord. Now, don’t misunderstand<br />

me – I am not suggesting that “the Day of the Lord” only<br />

refers to the end of the world and t-he Last Judgment. Far from<br />

it. Nevertheless, a solid grasp of this Biblical concept will provide<br />

us with an interpretive key, a method for arriving at an accurate,<br />

Scripture-based understanding of the Second Coming.<br />

The first Biblical use of the term Day of the Lord was by the<br />

prophet Amos, in a very strange reference. Speaking to the rebellious<br />

Israelites who were soon to be destroyed by the<br />

Assyrians, Amos said: “Alas, you who are longing for the Day<br />

of the LoRD, for what purpose will the Day of the LORD be to<br />

you? It will be darkness and not light . . .“ (Amos 5 :19). The important<br />

thing for us to notice at the beginning is that this expression<br />

had never been used before, at least not in Scripture. Yet it<br />

seems to have been a rather common, familiar idea in the Israel<br />

of the eighth century B.C. Amos did not question its validity:<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!