12.07.2013 Views

NATURAL ENGAGEMENTS AND ECOLOGICAL AESTHETICS ...

NATURAL ENGAGEMENTS AND ECOLOGICAL AESTHETICS ...

NATURAL ENGAGEMENTS AND ECOLOGICAL AESTHETICS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For some, the remnants of this failed Quito in the jungle can still be discerned in the landscape. As<br />

a teenager, Ventura was employed as a woodsman on the interoceanic highway that was to connect<br />

the oil rich region of Coca to Baeza, from which there was a road on to Quito. His crew began in<br />

Coca and they were to cut a transect to the west until the half way mark where they would meet<br />

with a crew that was to have cut the transect originating in Baeza. They never met with the Baeza<br />

crew and, running out of supplies, Ventura’s crew was forced to turn back; indeed, this road was<br />

never built. The half way mark was approximately at a spot known as Quirihua near the Paya<br />

Yacu, located on a plain to the north of the Suno River headwaters. Here Ventura was surprised to<br />

find “cement” steps, as well as a stone road. These, he felt, were all that remained of the city that<br />

the king failed to build. Ventura concluded that if Quito would have been built there, Ávila,<br />

because of its proximity, would have also become a “big city” (“jatun llacta”) and by now its<br />

inhabitants would have become “de-Indianized” mestizos like the highlanders (jahuallacta). 59<br />

All of these examples illustrate how people of the “Quijos” region, today and in the past,<br />

explain their economic and geographical isolation from a wealthy metropolis in terms of a failure<br />

to establish that metropolis in their region. It is, in all these cases, due to local decisions and<br />

acts—the failure to properly take care of the Virgin in Oyacachi or the rejection of the king and<br />

his city by the Sumaco curaga—that Quito does not exist in the lowlands. I believe, as I will<br />

explore subsequently, that this “personalization” of Quito explains in part why it is also seen as<br />

accessible and why, in some ways, it is also seen as a potentially tangible presence in the forest.<br />

Quito seems to have been imagined by the Runa as a kind of worldly paradise of opulence<br />

and freedom to which whites, such as priests, had privileged access. Gianotti, a Josephine mis-<br />

sionary, wrote in 1924 of finding a Runa peon on one of the oppressive rubber estates of the Napo<br />

River. This man wanted to escape with the priests, thinking that he would thus be able to live in<br />

a “paradise” in Quito:<br />

Arriving on a dark and rainy night to Belleza […] we found a poor Indian<br />

(indiecito) soaking and shivering with cold and hunger. “Who are you? Where do<br />

you come from? Where are you going?” were our questions. With great effort he<br />

250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!