You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Cats</strong> <strong>TNR</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />
determining whether a cat belongs to a managed colony. In progressive systems, animal<br />
control will not trap an eartipped cat or, if the cat has been turned into a shelter by a<br />
private party, will attempt to locate the caretaker.<br />
For many caretakers and veterinarians new to working with feral cats, there is initially<br />
a negative reaction to eartipping. It is seen as a kind of mutilation of the animal and<br />
attempts are made to find some other, less invasive means of identification. By now, all<br />
other methods attempted have proved failures.<br />
Eartagging involves the insertion of a metal clip into the side of the ear. The method<br />
suffers from a number of defects. Ear tags were designed for certain domestic farm<br />
animals, not for free-roaming cats. The tags are small and almost impossible to observe<br />
at a distance. In addition, experience has shown that sometimes they do fall off. They<br />
can get caught in twigs and thin branches and cause tears with subsequent infections.<br />
Tattooing the inner ear provides no visual cue for determining whether a cat has<br />
already been altered without having to trap her first. Even when the cat is in the trap, it<br />
often cannot be discerned out in the field whether a tattoo is present or not. Instead, only<br />
after the cat has been brought to the clinic and sedated can this be determined. The<br />
practice of tattooing also potentially increases the risk of disease transmission. Unless<br />
the tattooing instruments are sterilized after use on each cat, blood to blood transmission<br />
of germs is possible.<br />
Photos are impractical because it’s hard to take good ones, they’re not always<br />
available right when you need to look at them, and no visual cue is provided for third<br />
parties like animal control or a concerned neighbor unaware of your work. In addition,<br />
photos are not even helpful to the caretaker in colonies where many of the cats share<br />
similar appearances, such as an all tabby or all black colony.<br />
Doing nothing except relying on the caretaker’s knowledge of the colony is risky,<br />
even when the caretaker knows the cats extremely well. If the caretaker changes, there’s<br />
no record. In addition, as with photos, there’s no visual cue for third parties.<br />
While in an ideal world, there would be no need to tip a feral cat’s ear, in truth it is far<br />
less invasive a procedure than the spay or neuter itself. Because it serves a vital purpose,<br />
and because there is value in having one universally known symbol of identification,<br />
eartipping should always be part of the standard feral protocol.<br />
• FIV/FeLV testing<br />
The vast majority of experienced <strong>TNR</strong> programs do not perform FIV/FeLV testing on<br />
feral cats who are asymptomatic, meaning they are not showing signs of ill health. There<br />
are several good reasons for this policy, which are discussed below:<br />
1. Inefficient use of limited resources<br />
Studies show the prevalence of FIV (feline aids) and FeLV (feline leukemia) in the<br />
feral population is similar to that in the domestic cat population – approximately 4% have<br />
FeLV and 2% have FIV. On average then, testing 1000 feral cats will result in the<br />
identification of 60 cats who test positive for either FIV or FeLV. At a relatively low<br />
cost of $10 per test, that would mean $10,000 needs to be spent to identify 60 positive<br />
cats. That same $10,000 could be put instead towards neutering hundreds of ferals. If<br />
79