for i j=SPb-n [2 1 +LSPb3[2 1 +HISPb,n[I] ; j~SPb~n[21+LSPb~m~ZI+HISPb~n[nbnbsub~l-~SPb-n[2] ; j++) lstatus = CPXchgcoef (env, lp, (int) (SPb-m[21-LOWSPb,m[2] -HIS?b,m[ll -1-totlev2C+levS,count + (iter-count-2) l , j, LpS~[nb~subs1-~0MeL[j+H1SPbbnI21-SPb~nf21-~S~bbm[2~-~1~?b~n(1]]~ : 1 I lstatus = CPXchgcoef(env,lp, (=nt) (S?b-m[2]-LOWSPb-m[2] -HISPb-m[i] -l+cctlev2Ctlev2,count * titer-counc-2)1, j, LpSub[nb-subsl->OMeLIj+HfSPb-n[I!l); t Iscatus = CPXchgcoef (env. Ip, ( int) (SPb-m[2] -LOWSPb,m[S] -HISPb-n[l]-l~totlevZC+lev2,co~t + iter-counc-21, j, LpSub[nb,subs]-~PiD[j-S?b~n[2]-LSPbbm[2]-HISPb,n[~,s~s-l]+LSPb~n~2l 1 ) ; 1 lstatus = CPXchgcoef (env, Ip, ( int 1 (SPb-m [ 2 I -LOWSPb,m[2 ] -HISPbbm[ 11 -l+totlev2C+lev2,co~~t + iter-count-21, LpSub[Z]-~n+LSPb,m[2l+HISPbbn[nb_subs]-LSbn[2]+l, Theta-coef); short UpperBound (LpSubProb "LpSub) C ..., I3EFfNF IOCAL VARIiSLES AND XSKATE MPLFORIES ..... 1' Xeceive infonnacion <strong>of</strong> linking variables and constraints <strong>of</strong> other parts *I for(k=l; kLabjcoef, LSPb,n[k],T): info = pvm_rpkdauble (lpSub[k] ->LEP-bnds, LS?b,n [kl , 1) ; info = pvn_upkdouble(5pSub[k]-~L~o-bnds, LSPb,n[k],L); info = pvm-upklong(5pÇubikl -xLpfrcs, LSPb-n[k]rl, 1) ; Lnfo = pvn-upklong (LpSubik] ->mmmbs, LpSub[k] ->clpnts [LSPb,r?[kll, 1) ; info = pm-upkdo~le(lpSub[kl->coeffs, LpSub[k!->clpnts[SS?b,n[kII ,l); ... CO-T ORIGINAL DATA sense, objcoeffs and matcnt TO CONFORM CPLEX ..-. * Ncw copy the probkm data into the Lp '/ status=C?Xc3pylp (=v, lp, (kt) t~Sub[2] n , i n 5pSub[21 ->m. -I,cbjcoeffs, LpSub[2]->rbs,sense, tint*) (LpSub[2]->clpntsl, matcnt, (int*) LpSub[2]-~rwnmbs, LpS~[2i->c0eff~,LpSubI2]->I0~brrds, LpSub[2l->up,bnds, mu) ; l * Make the upper-~pper bomd sÿbproblem fo,?nat <strong>of</strong> the fizst iceration by deleting row zero and ocher partsr lickiog constraints. Md artificial
variables and add other part's linking variablese/ status = CPXdelrows lenv, lp, O, 0) ; if ( status ) { fprintf fstderr, "Failed to delete row O\nn); goto TERMINATE; 1 if (HISPb-mf 11 >= 11 status = CPXdelrows (env, lp, O, HISPb,m[ll-1) ; if (nb-subs > 2) status = CPXdelrows Lenv, lp, ( int) (SPb-m[2 1 -HISPb,m[l] -LOWSPb-m[2] -1) , (int) (SPb-n[2] -EISPb-m[L j-tl 1 ; status=CP.Ynewcols (env, lp, (int) LSPb-n[21, arti-obj , NULL, NULL, NULL, NEJLL) ; for (i=0: in) ri, arti-coef ; for (k=l; k 0) scatus = CP.uewcols cenv, lp, (int 1 LSPb-n[kl, LpSub[kJ ->Lobjcoef, LpSub [k] ->Llo,bnds, LpSub [k] ->Lup,bnds, NULL, N üUI ; ifiLpSub[kI -xwmbs[p] > SISPb-m[l] && LpSubIkI->rwnnbs[pj
- Page 1 and 2:
A PARALLEL PRIMAL-DUAL DECOMPOSITIO
- Page 3 and 4:
The University of Waterloo requires
- Page 5 and 6:
WATPAR, and in each of the tests, t
- Page 7 and 8:
To Soyoung and Katherine Eugene Par
- Page 9 and 10:
3.5 Sumary and Observations on the
- Page 11 and 12:
Table 4 . I Table 5.1 Table 5.2 Tab
- Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Brief Hi
- Page 15 and 16:
1.2 Motivation and Objectives of th
- Page 17 and 18:
2. Pmve and dernonstrate the conver
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2 Literature Review This ch
- Page 21 and 22:
Benders komposition Method In the B
- Page 23 and 24:
in this algorithm, both subproblems
- Page 25 and 26:
SIMD vs MIMD Panllel computers cm b
- Page 27 and 28:
apan. In mmy LAN's, communication i
- Page 29 and 30:
angular linear programs by fixing t
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 3 Paralle1 Decomposition of
- Page 33 and 34:
ound constraints. The two parts are
- Page 35 and 36:
constnicted in the sarne way by res
- Page 37 and 38:
1T 17 t-IT T nlk*'T )' and &'-' = (
- Page 39 and 40:
a proposal is passed back to the fi
- Page 41 and 42:
END - solve ; if it is infeasible o
- Page 43 and 44:
l, and Theorem 3. lb mles out the p
- Page 45 and 46:
nonlinking constraints and upper bo
- Page 47 and 48:
(The "only if* part) If P is infeas
- Page 49 and 50:
. - Thmm 3.6 Suppose (-ri. )Jik, VI
- Page 51 and 52:
the optimal value has ken reached.
- Page 53 and 54:
spfl, we have have k .J< k PI -1 -
- Page 55 and 56:
zi - $' 5 z+ - &J-[, and by Theorem
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 4 Paraiiel Decomposition of
- Page 59 and 60:
upper bound constraints and nonnega
- Page 61 and 62:
type subproblem. The lower bound su
- Page 63 and 64:
An algorithm could be defined to ex
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 43 9-stage decomposition pri
- Page 67 and 68:
combinations of known solutions of
- Page 69 and 70:
lower bound subproblem (parts 1 and
- Page 71 and 72:
&.',* and CI::;, are a 1 x (i - 1)
- Page 73 and 74:
from the same aggregated subproblem
- Page 75 and 76:
problems is discussed. Various prop
- Page 77 and 78:
Processor 2 Step O. Set level I cou
- Page 79 and 80:
- update and solve spi ; record opt
- Page 81 and 82:
for the optimum by exchanging the p
- Page 83 and 84:
The next result guarantees that in
- Page 85 and 86:
fonn a nondecreasing senes of lower
- Page 87 and 88:
one upper bound subproblem. The alg
- Page 89 and 90:
su, , for al1 i Note that when k= 1
- Page 91 and 92:
with proposals or cuts from other s
- Page 93 and 94:
- if t is an upper bound subproblem
- Page 95 and 96:
Proof : The Assumption guarantees t
- Page 97 and 98:
nNk-'. Proof : For i= 1.2. ... . N
- Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 5 Preliminary Implementatio
- Page 101 and 102:
5.1.1 Decomposition Phase In the de
- Page 103 and 104: NB,~,PEI 8 # Selectmg the rows ROWS
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 53 Example of multi-part str
- Page 107 and 108: in each computer as discussed in Ch
- Page 109 and 110: followiag 4 parts: scenarios 1 to 1
- Page 111 and 112: "WSET' is the time taken on the RSI
- Page 113 and 114: esults of the parallel decompositio
- Page 115 and 116: Table 5.6 Performance of Parailel D
- Page 117 and 118: We dso anaiyzed the speed-ups and e
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 6 Conclusions and Future Re
- Page 121 and 122: 8. tested several models for conver
- Page 123 and 124: computational speed for some real w
- Page 125 and 126: APPENDIX A GAMS codes of the test m
- Page 127 and 128: hydrA 25, ...., hydrZ 1s /; paramet
- Page 129 and 130: NwatBal(hydro,u,pericds,senarios1 .
- Page 131 and 132: hydrEI 1100, hydrB 1200, ..... hydr
- Page 133 and 134: VARIABLES En 'Expectation of the ut
- Page 135 and 136: APPENDIX B The C codes of WSET We p
- Page 137 and 138: k denoces an index of SubProblern t
- Page 139 and 140: SPb~[kl-+; 1 else ( if (rowinfoIi]
- Page 141 and 142: * Pack initial &ta and send '/ for(
- Page 143 and 144: Appendiv C C codes of WATPAR We pre
- Page 145 and 146: if (LpSub [k] ->rwnmbs [pl > HISPb-
- Page 147 and 148: * Use advanced basis at each iterat
- Page 149 and 150: status = CPXnewcols (env,lp, 1, &Lp
- Page 151 and 152: TERMINATE : ..,. Free up the proble
- Page 153: short SolveProb(C3XEWptr env, CP.XL
- Page 157 and 158: i* Add a cut for upper level iterat
- Page 159 and 160: C3 Proecssor 3 : Lower-Upper Bound
- Page 161 and 162: t for(k=l; k c icer-count; k+-1 sta
- Page 163 and 164: { gectimeofday(&tvl, (struct cimezo
- Page 165 and 166: i status = CPXchgcoef(env, lp, (int
- Page 167 and 168: status = AddLamcols ( LpSub, env, I
- Page 169 and 170: BIBLIOGRAPHY Aardal. K. And A. An.
- Page 171 and 172: Computation". Mathematical Programm