A Course on Large Deviations with an Introduction to Gibbs Measures.
A Course on Large Deviations with an Introduction to Gibbs Measures.
A Course on Large Deviations with an Introduction to Gibbs Measures.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
More generalities <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Cramér’s theorem<br />
3.1. Weak large deviati<strong>on</strong> principles<br />
Chapter 3<br />
As we have seen in Example 1.1, when proving the lower large deviati<strong>on</strong><br />
bound (2.4) it is enough <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sider G that are local neighborhoods. It is<br />
also enough <strong>to</strong> focus <strong>on</strong> local neighborhoods if <strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong>ly needs <strong>to</strong> prove the<br />
upper large deviati<strong>on</strong> bound (2.3) for compact sets F . This often simplifies<br />
the <strong>an</strong>alysis c<strong>on</strong>siderably.<br />
For the discussi<strong>on</strong> in this secti<strong>on</strong> let X be a Hausdorff space.<br />
Definiti<strong>on</strong> 3.1. A sequence of probability measures {µn} ⊂ M1(X ) is said<br />
<strong>to</strong> satisfy a weak large deviati<strong>on</strong> principle <strong>with</strong> lower semic<strong>on</strong>tinuous rate<br />
functi<strong>on</strong> I : X → [0, ∞] <strong>an</strong>d normalizati<strong>on</strong> {rn} if the lower large deviati<strong>on</strong><br />
bound (2.4) holds for all open sets G ⊂ X <strong>an</strong>d the upper large deviati<strong>on</strong><br />
bound (2.3) holds for all compact sets F ⊂ X .<br />
With enough c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>on</strong> the tails of the measures µn this is in fact sufficient<br />
for the full LDP <strong>to</strong> hold.<br />
Definiti<strong>on</strong> 3.2. We say {µn} ⊂ M1(X ) is exp<strong>on</strong>entially tight <strong>with</strong> normalizati<strong>on</strong><br />
rn if for each b > 0 there exists a compact set Kb such that<br />
µn(K c b ) ≤ e−rnb for all n ∈ N.<br />
Note that if {µn} is exp<strong>on</strong>entially tight <strong>with</strong> normalizati<strong>on</strong> rn ↗ ∞,<br />
then {µn} is tight; see Appendix A.1 for the definiti<strong>on</strong> of tightness of a<br />
family of measures.<br />
19