14.07.2013 Views

A Course on Large Deviations with an Introduction to Gibbs Measures.

A Course on Large Deviations with an Introduction to Gibbs Measures.

A Course on Large Deviations with an Introduction to Gibbs Measures.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3. Limits, deviati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s 27<br />

3.3. Limits, deviati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>an</strong>d fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Let Yn be a sequence of r<strong>an</strong>dom variables <strong>with</strong> values in a metric space<br />

(X , d) <strong>an</strong>d let µn be the law of Yn: µn(B) = P {Yn ∈ B}. Naturally <strong>an</strong> LDP<br />

for the sequence {µn} is related <strong>to</strong> the asymp<strong>to</strong>tic behavior of Yn. Suppose<br />

LDP(µn, rn, I) holds <strong>an</strong>d Yn → ¯y in probability. Then the limit ¯y does not<br />

represent a deviati<strong>on</strong>. The rate functi<strong>on</strong> I recognizes this <strong>with</strong> the value<br />

I(¯y) = 0 that follows from the upper bound. For <strong>an</strong>y open neighborhood G<br />

of ¯y we have µn(G) → 1. C<strong>on</strong>sequently for the closure<br />

0 ≤ inf<br />

¯G<br />

I ≤ − lim r −1<br />

n log µn( ¯ G) = 0.<br />

Let G shrink down <strong>to</strong> ¯y. Lower semic<strong>on</strong>tinuity forces I(¯y) = 0.<br />

The reader should recognize though that the zero set of I does not<br />

necessarily represent limit values. It may simply be that the probability of<br />

a deviati<strong>on</strong> decays slower th<strong>an</strong> exp<strong>on</strong>entially which again leads <strong>to</strong> I = 0.<br />

Every rate functi<strong>on</strong> satisfies inf I = 0 as c<strong>an</strong> be seen by taking F = X in<br />

the upper large deviati<strong>on</strong> bound (2.3).<br />

On the other h<strong>an</strong>d, we c<strong>an</strong> deduce c<strong>on</strong>vergence of the r<strong>an</strong>dom variables<br />

from the LDP if the rate functi<strong>on</strong> has good properties. Assume that I is a<br />

tight rate functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>an</strong>d has a unique zero I(¯y) = 0. Let A = {y : d(y, ¯y) ≥ ε}.<br />

Compactness <strong>an</strong>d lower semic<strong>on</strong>tinuity ensure that the infimum u = infA I<br />

is achieved. Since ¯y ∈ A, it must be that u > 0. Then, for n large enough,<br />

the upper large deviati<strong>on</strong> bound (2.3) implies<br />

P {d(Yn, ¯y) ≥ ε} ≤ e −rn(infA I−u/2) = e −rnu/2 .<br />

Thus, Yn c<strong>on</strong>verges <strong>to</strong> ¯y in probability. If, moreover, rn grows fast enough,<br />

for example like n, then the Borel-C<strong>an</strong>telli lemma implies that Yn c<strong>on</strong>verges<br />

<strong>to</strong> ¯y a.s.<br />

For i.i.d. variables Cramér’s theorem should also be unders<strong>to</strong>od in relati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>with</strong> the central limit theorem (CLT). C<strong>on</strong>sider the case where M(θ) is<br />

finite in a neighborhood of the origin so that there is a finite me<strong>an</strong> ¯x = E[X]<br />

<strong>an</strong>d I(x) > 0 for x = ¯x (Exercise 3.8). Then Cramér’s theorem says that<br />

order 1 deviati<strong>on</strong>s of Sn/n from ¯x have exp<strong>on</strong>entially v<strong>an</strong>ishing probability:<br />

for each δ > 0 there exists a c<strong>on</strong>st<strong>an</strong>t c > 0 such that for large n<br />

P {|Sn/n − ¯x| ≥ δ} ≤ e −cn .<br />

By c<strong>on</strong>trast, the CLT tells us that small deviati<strong>on</strong>s of order n −1/2 c<strong>on</strong>verge<br />

<strong>to</strong> a limit distributi<strong>on</strong>: for r ∈ R,<br />

P {Sn/n − ¯x ≥ rn −1/2 } −→<br />

n→∞<br />

∞<br />

r<br />

e −s2 /2σ 2<br />

√ 2πσ 2 ds

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!