CI[)l1:721 - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI
CI[)l1:721 - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI
CI[)l1:721 - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
58<br />
CHAPTER 5<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
As mentioned in Chapter 2. there are several problems inherent in<br />
archaeology in the Maine-Maritimes region (I.e. the history <strong>of</strong> research and poor<br />
preservation). Consequently, many <strong>of</strong> the following conclusions have bee:-.<br />
augmented by dala from previous research. Many <strong>of</strong>these, too, are speculative<br />
in nature and should be considered as hypulheses for future testing, rather<br />
than derinile statements on the culture history <strong>of</strong> the Maine-Maritimes region.<br />
The following will examine the Tobique Complex and the potential sig<br />
nificance and implications <strong>of</strong> trait continuity from the Late and Terminal Archaic<br />
Periods into the Early Ceramic Period. Continuity wiU be descnbed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
the ·SOUfce tradition" for each trait. The cultural implications will be disOJssed<br />
and some comments win be <strong>of</strong>fered regarding the transition between the Archaic<br />
and ceramic Periods in the region.<br />
The Tobigue Complex<br />
The Tobique Complex, represented by Group 4 stemmed bifaces remains<br />
an enigma. There are few traits suggesting affiliation with a:1y other tool<br />
tradition, other than Wright's (1972) weakly defined Shield Archaic: Tradition.<br />
This affiliation is only evident in frequencies <strong>of</strong> functional categories for lithic<br />
lools. There is an immense amount ot stylistic devialion in tool morphology