18.07.2013 Views

CI[)l1:721 - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI

CI[)l1:721 - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI

CI[)l1:721 - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58<br />

CHAPTER 5<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

As mentioned in Chapter 2. there are several problems inherent in<br />

archaeology in the Maine-Maritimes region (I.e. the history <strong>of</strong> research and poor<br />

preservation). Consequently, many <strong>of</strong> the following conclusions have bee:-.<br />

augmented by dala from previous research. Many <strong>of</strong>these, too, are speculative<br />

in nature and should be considered as hypulheses for future testing, rather<br />

than derinile statements on the culture history <strong>of</strong> the Maine-Maritimes region.<br />

The following will examine the Tobique Complex and the potential sig­<br />

nificance and implications <strong>of</strong> trait continuity from the Late and Terminal Archaic<br />

Periods into the Early Ceramic Period. Continuity wiU be descnbed in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the ·SOUfce tradition" for each trait. The cultural implications will be disOJssed<br />

and some comments win be <strong>of</strong>fered regarding the transition between the Archaic<br />

and ceramic Periods in the region.<br />

The Tobigue Complex<br />

The Tobique Complex, represented by Group 4 stemmed bifaces remains<br />

an enigma. There are few traits suggesting affiliation with a:1y other tool<br />

tradition, other than Wright's (1972) weakly defined Shield Archaic: Tradition.<br />

This affiliation is only evident in frequencies <strong>of</strong> functional categories for lithic<br />

lools. There is an immense amount ot stylistic devialion in tool morphology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!