19.07.2013 Views

measurement and comparison of solar radiation estimation models ...

measurement and comparison of solar radiation estimation models ...

measurement and comparison of solar radiation estimation models ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4<br />

ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL RADIATION MODELS<br />

In the literature, many <strong>models</strong> were developed to estimate the global <strong>solar</strong><br />

<strong>radiation</strong>. In this study 9 <strong>models</strong> <strong>and</strong> 3 new developed equations were used to estimate<br />

monthly-average global <strong>solar</strong> <strong>radiation</strong>. They were grouped <strong>and</strong> examined according to<br />

type <strong>of</strong> the equation that were namely, angular equations (Group 1), linear equations<br />

(Group 2), quadratic equations <strong>of</strong> second (Group 3) <strong>and</strong> third order (Group 4).<br />

4.1. Kılıc <strong>and</strong> Ozturk’s Model<br />

The coefficients a <strong>and</strong> b were determined as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>solar</strong> declination (δ) ,<br />

latitude <strong>of</strong> sight (ϕ) <strong>and</strong> altitude (Z).<br />

where,<br />

H<br />

Hₒ<br />

S<br />

= a + b (4.1)<br />

Sₒ<br />

a = 0.103 + 0.000017푍 + 0.198 cos(휙 − 훿) (4.2)<br />

b = 0.533 + 0.165 cos(휙 − 훿) (4.3)<br />

The model was in the angular type group (Group1) <strong>of</strong> which were derived by<br />

modifying the original Angstrom-type equation.<br />

4.2. Akinoglu <strong>and</strong> Ecevit’s Model<br />

<strong>of</strong> Turkey.<br />

The following equation placed in Group 3 was obtained for the various regions<br />

H = Hₒ [0.145 + 0.845 S<br />

S<br />

− 0.280 <br />

Sₒ Sₒ <br />

<br />

] (4.4)<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!