20.07.2013 Views

UHF2 realignment study - Ofcom Licensing

UHF2 realignment study - Ofcom Licensing

UHF2 realignment study - Ofcom Licensing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egulatory uncertainty, which has left businesses in uncertainty for of the past few years. It is<br />

likely that systems will continue to be replaced and maintained and over a number of years,<br />

with some services over-time moving out of the band. For those services that are in the<br />

South East it is likely that increased interference will either force a move outside of the band<br />

or indeed, force an alignment of ‘pockets’ of spectrum. <strong>Ofcom</strong> and the E&PSS spectrum<br />

manager, through the market mechanisms such as trading and liberalisation, could facilitate<br />

alignment. However, the ‘ripple effect’ and guard bands required to manage interference<br />

would need to be managed, leading to difficulties in assigning spectrum.<br />

i. Guard Bands when aligning spectrum<br />

An important element of any partial band alignment or stepped full alignment is providing a<br />

measure of protection to protect each service where there is aligned and unaligned<br />

spectrum. This protection would in effect require allocating a guard band of the size of a<br />

channel and also geographical separation in the order of kilometres between adjacent<br />

channel users without additional site engineering being needed. Therefore, as alignment<br />

takes place on particular channels a ‘ripple effect’ occurs where assignments need to have a<br />

geographical separation. If alignment were to begin on the south coast, the effect of this<br />

would be larger geographical separations within the UK, creating a ‘ripple effect’ of<br />

interference. Managing interference for assignments would be complex to manage as the<br />

interference would have an effect on adjacent assignments. Therefore, co-ordinating and<br />

managing such an exercise is extremely labour intensive when having to consider a total of<br />

17,000 assignments in the bands, can lead to a question of practicality.<br />

9.2.5 If direct regulatory intervention was the way forward in the band, what would be the<br />

main challenges?<br />

It is likely that stakeholders would prevent any attempt of direct regulatory intervention<br />

without any assurances on costs and mitigating risks. Managing the costs and practical<br />

implementation of a managed partial or full alignment project would be complex due to a lack<br />

of resources such as skilled labour and high costs, which as identified in this report return no<br />

net benefit.<br />

It is our opinion that the only possible practical method of aligning spectrum in a co-ordinated<br />

and efficient manner would be to use an ‘Overlay auction’, which is described in more detail<br />

below. This method would be in our opinion the most appropriate method to introduce future<br />

wideband services within the <strong>UHF2</strong> band.<br />

i. Regulatory Intervention in a fragmented band<br />

One option for re-configuration of the <strong>UHF2</strong> band is an ‘overlay licence’ or ‘overlay auction’,<br />

which has been used successfully in other countries. There are two main circumstances in<br />

which a spectrum band may need to be cleared of existing users:<br />

240689 - 450-470 Study Final Print<br />

Version (Dec08).doc<br />

when a band is fragmented;<br />

Page 101<br />

abc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!