3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.5 Conformal form <strong>of</strong> the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system 95<br />
Since A is traceless, ˜γjkA jk = Ψ −4 γjkA jk = 0. Then the above equation reduces to DjA ij =<br />
˜DjA ij + 10A ij ˜ Dj ln Ψ, which can be rewritten as<br />
DjA ij = Ψ −10 ˜ Dj<br />
Ψ 10 A ij . (6.81)<br />
Notice that this identity is valid only because A ij is symmetric <strong>and</strong> traceless.<br />
Equation (6.81) suggests to introduce the quantity 4<br />
 ij := Ψ 10 A ij . (6.82)<br />
This corresponds to the scaling factor α = −10 in Eq. (6.58). It has been first introduced by<br />
Lichnerowicz in 1944 [177]. Thanks to it <strong>and</strong> Eq. (6.79), the momentum constraint equation<br />
(4.66) can be rewritten as<br />
˜Dj Âij − 2<br />
3 Ψ6 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 10 p i . (6.83)<br />
As for Ãij, we define Âij as the tensor field deduced from Âij by lowering the indices with<br />
the conformal metric:<br />
Âij := ˜γik˜γjl Âkl<br />
Taking into account Eq. (6.82) <strong>and</strong> ˜γij = Ψ −4 γij, we get<br />
(6.84)<br />
Âij = Ψ 2 Aij . (6.85)<br />
6.5 Conformal form <strong>of</strong> the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system<br />
Having performed a conformal decomposition <strong>of</strong> γ <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the traceless part <strong>of</strong> K, we are now<br />
in position to rewrite the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system (4.63)-(4.66) in terms <strong>of</strong> conformal quantities.<br />
6.5.1 Dynamical part <strong>of</strong> Einstein equation<br />
Let us consider Eq. (4.64), i.e. the so-called dynamical equation in the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system:<br />
<br />
LmKij = −DiDjN + N Rij + KKij − 2KikK k j + 4π [(S − E)γij<br />
<br />
− 2Sij] . (6.86)<br />
Let us substitute Aij + (K/3)γij for Kij [Eq. (6.57)]. The left-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> the above equation<br />
becomes<br />
LmKij = LmAij + 1<br />
3 LmK γij + 1<br />
3<br />
K Lmγij . (6.87)<br />
<br />
=−2NKij<br />
In this equation appears LmK. We may express it by taking the trace <strong>of</strong> Eq. (6.86) <strong>and</strong> making<br />
use <strong>of</strong> Eq. (3.49):<br />
LmK = γ ij LmKij + 2NKijK ij , (6.88)<br />
4 notice that we have used a hat, instead <strong>of</strong> a tilde, to distinguish this quantity from that defined by (6.76)