20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.5 Conformal form <strong>of</strong> the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system 95<br />

Since A is traceless, ˜γjkA jk = Ψ −4 γjkA jk = 0. Then the above equation reduces to DjA ij =<br />

˜DjA ij + 10A ij ˜ Dj ln Ψ, which can be rewritten as<br />

DjA ij = Ψ −10 ˜ Dj<br />

Ψ 10 A ij . (6.81)<br />

Notice that this identity is valid only because A ij is symmetric <strong>and</strong> traceless.<br />

Equation (6.81) suggests to introduce the quantity 4<br />

 ij := Ψ 10 A ij . (6.82)<br />

This corresponds to the scaling factor α = −10 in Eq. (6.58). It has been first introduced by<br />

Lichnerowicz in 1944 [177]. Thanks to it <strong>and</strong> Eq. (6.79), the momentum constraint equation<br />

(4.66) can be rewritten as<br />

˜Dj Âij − 2<br />

3 Ψ6 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 10 p i . (6.83)<br />

As for Ãij, we define Âij as the tensor field deduced from Âij by lowering the indices with<br />

the conformal metric:<br />

Âij := ˜γik˜γjl Âkl<br />

Taking into account Eq. (6.82) <strong>and</strong> ˜γij = Ψ −4 γij, we get<br />

(6.84)<br />

Âij = Ψ 2 Aij . (6.85)<br />

6.5 Conformal form <strong>of</strong> the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system<br />

Having performed a conformal decomposition <strong>of</strong> γ <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the traceless part <strong>of</strong> K, we are now<br />

in position to rewrite the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system (4.63)-(4.66) in terms <strong>of</strong> conformal quantities.<br />

6.5.1 Dynamical part <strong>of</strong> Einstein equation<br />

Let us consider Eq. (4.64), i.e. the so-called dynamical equation in the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system:<br />

<br />

LmKij = −DiDjN + N Rij + KKij − 2KikK k j + 4π [(S − E)γij<br />

<br />

− 2Sij] . (6.86)<br />

Let us substitute Aij + (K/3)γij for Kij [Eq. (6.57)]. The left-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> the above equation<br />

becomes<br />

LmKij = LmAij + 1<br />

3 LmK γij + 1<br />

3<br />

K Lmγij . (6.87)<br />

<br />

=−2NKij<br />

In this equation appears LmK. We may express it by taking the trace <strong>of</strong> Eq. (6.86) <strong>and</strong> making<br />

use <strong>of</strong> Eq. (3.49):<br />

LmK = γ ij LmKij + 2NKijK ij , (6.88)<br />

4 notice that we have used a hat, instead <strong>of</strong> a tilde, to distinguish this quantity from that defined by (6.76)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!