21.07.2013 Views

Fractional order signal processing in biology/biomedical signal ...

Fractional order signal processing in biology/biomedical signal ...

Fractional order signal processing in biology/biomedical signal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Fractional</strong> <strong>order</strong> <strong>signal</strong> <strong>process<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>biology</strong>/<strong>biomedical</strong> <strong>signal</strong> analysis<br />

YangQuan Chen, Act<strong>in</strong>g Director<br />

Center for Self-Organiz<strong>in</strong>g and Intelligent Systems (CSOIS),<br />

Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Utah State University<br />

E: yqchen@ece.usu.edu; T: (435)797-0148; F: (435)797-3054<br />

W: http://www.csois.usu.edu/people/yqchen<br />

Jan. 26, 2005.


Slide-2<br />

Comments<br />

• Jo<strong>in</strong>t work with Professor Anhong Zhou, BIE<br />

Dept. of USU.<br />

• Just some prelim. Results to show the potential<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-3<br />

<strong>Fractional</strong> <strong>order</strong> <strong>signal</strong> <strong>process<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

techniques<br />

• <strong>Fractional</strong> differentiators/filters<br />

• <strong>Fractional</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration: ARFIMA (autoregressive<br />

fractional <strong>in</strong>tegral mov<strong>in</strong>g average), or FARIMA<br />

• R/S Hurst exponent estimation<br />

• FD (fractional dimension) estimation<br />

• FrFT (fractional Fourier transform)<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-4<br />

What is fractional <strong>order</strong> calculus?<br />

• FOC is a generalization of the<br />

differential and <strong>in</strong>tegral operators:<br />

• where α is the fractional <strong>order</strong> which<br />

can be a complex number and the<br />

constant a is related to the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

conditions. Two commonly used<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itions, i.e., the Grünwald-<br />

Letnikov (GL) def<strong>in</strong>ition and the<br />

Riemann-Liouville (RL) def<strong>in</strong>ition:<br />

• where [•] is a floor<strong>in</strong>g-operator.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-5<br />

Why fractional <strong>order</strong> calculus?<br />

• Real world is fractional <strong>order</strong> <strong>in</strong> nature. The concept of fractional calculus has<br />

tremendous potential to change the way we see, model, and control the nature<br />

around us. In the past, the behavior of materials and systems were modeled us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>teger <strong>order</strong> derivatives. It is now well known that many physical phenomena<br />

can be modeled accurately and effectively us<strong>in</strong>g fractional derivatives, whereas<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tegral derivative based models capture these phenomena only<br />

approximately. It has been demonstrated that many fractional derivatives based<br />

controls are far superior than <strong>in</strong>teger <strong>order</strong> derivative based control schemes.<br />

The concept of a real l<strong>in</strong>e was not complete until the concept of zero, rational,<br />

and irrational numbers was <strong>in</strong>troduced. Similarly, the concept of derivatives will<br />

not be complete until the concepts of fractional derivatives (or derivatives of<br />

arbitrary <strong>order</strong>) are brought <strong>in</strong>to the picture. Deny<strong>in</strong>g it will be like say<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

zero, fractional, and irrational numbers do not exist.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-6<br />

Detection of DNA hybridization on gold<br />

coated QCM surface<br />

• The work<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of QCM is based on the l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between the<br />

change of frequency (∆f) and the change of mass on the crystal surface, as<br />

described <strong>in</strong> Suerbrey equation. In present work, the gold surface of QCM was<br />

immobilized with s<strong>in</strong>gle strand DNA (ssDNA) and subsequently hybridized with<br />

target DNA (tDNA). In addition to ∆f, resistance (R) was simultaneously<br />

recorded <strong>in</strong> the course of ssDNA immobilization and hybridization. 100 ml of<br />

water, control probe DNA, and target DNA were dropped onto the gold surface<br />

of quartz crystal <strong>in</strong> sequence and the time profiles of the response curves of ∆f<br />

and R were obta<strong>in</strong>ed respectively. It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to observe the drastic<br />

oscillations of ∆f and R <strong>in</strong> the early period after add<strong>in</strong>g those three samples.<br />

Furthermore, <strong>in</strong> this paper, two fractional <strong>order</strong> <strong>signal</strong> <strong>process<strong>in</strong>g</strong> techniques,<br />

namely, fractional Fourier transform (FrFT) and rescaled range statistical<br />

analysis (R/S analysis), are applied to characterize the QCM <strong>signal</strong>s for easy<br />

differentiation of different cases studies <strong>in</strong> this research.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-7<br />

ARFIMA – def<strong>in</strong>ition of short and long memory process<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-8<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-9<br />

Fractal Dimensions<br />

• FD = <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic dimensionality<br />

“Embedd<strong>in</strong>g” dimensionality = 3<br />

Intr<strong>in</strong>sic dimensionality = 1<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-10<br />

Fractal Dimensions<br />

FD = <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic dimensionality<br />

[Belussi/1995]<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>ts to note:<br />

• FD can be a non-<strong>in</strong>teger<br />

• There are fast methods<br />

to compute it<br />

log( # pairs)<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University<br />

log(# pairs with<strong>in</strong> r)<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

Y axis<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Sierp<strong>in</strong>sky<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

X axis<br />

1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2<br />

= 1.56<br />

FD plot<br />

7<br />

-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2<br />

log(r)<br />

log(r)


Slide-11<br />

FrFT<br />

• A simple exposition to discrete FrFT can follow the<br />

classical discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of a s<strong>in</strong>gal f(n)<br />

by matrix notation f 1 =Ff where f is an N-by-1 column<br />

vector, F is the N-by-N DFT matrix and f 1 is the DFT of<br />

f. Similarly, the a-th <strong>order</strong> discrete FrFT of f, denoted as<br />

f a is def<strong>in</strong>ed as f a =F a f where F a is the N-by-N discrete<br />

FrFT matrix correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the a-th power of the<br />

classical DFT matrix F. Note that the def<strong>in</strong>itions of<br />

discrete FrFT depend on the <strong>in</strong>terpretations of the<br />

“power” [8]. Us<strong>in</strong>g fast discrete FrFT [11, 12], here we<br />

present the time-<strong>order</strong> representations of our QCM<br />

<strong>signal</strong>s for three cases <strong>in</strong> Figure 5 below.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-12<br />

(A) Case-1: 100 µl water<br />

(B) Case-2: 100 µl 1µΜ cDNA<br />

(C) Case-3: 100 µl 1µΜ tDNA<br />

Figure 5. FrFT based time-<strong>order</strong> representation (left column, frequency; right column: resistance)<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-13<br />

Hurst exponent<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g the possible “chaotic” behaviors <strong>in</strong> our QCM<br />

<strong>signal</strong>s, we attempt to apply the so-called rescaled range<br />

statistical analysis (R/S analysis) [14, 9, 10]. R/S analysis<br />

provides a sensitive method for reveal<strong>in</strong>g long-range<br />

correlations <strong>in</strong> random processes. For a discrete time<br />

series ξ t , its R/S statistics are def<strong>in</strong>ed as follows:<br />

where <strong>in</strong> X (t,τ), the mean over the time lag τ,<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-14<br />

• is removed when the expectation of ξ t is not 0.<br />

R(τ) is the self-adjusted range and R/S(τ) is the selfrescaled<br />

self-adjusted range. Many processes <strong>in</strong> nature are<br />

not <strong>in</strong>dependent random processes, but show significant<br />

long-term correlations. In this case the asymptotic scal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

law is modified and R/S(τ) is asymptotically given by a<br />

power law τ H . The correspond<strong>in</strong>g exponent H is called<br />

Hurst exponent. Persistent behavior is characterized by a<br />

Hurst exponent 0.5 < H < 1, anti-persistence is<br />

characterized by 0


Slide-15<br />

Log(R/S) vs. Log(n) plot for Cases 1, 2, and 3.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-16<br />

Table-1. Hurst exponents of Cases 1, 2, and 3<br />

Cases<br />

1. 100 µl water<br />

2. 100 µl cDNA<br />

3. 100 µl tDNA<br />

H (freq.)<br />

0.52773<br />

0.54039<br />

0.51352<br />

H (resist.)<br />

0.52773<br />

0.54039<br />

0.51352<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-17<br />

We have the follow<strong>in</strong>g observations and remarks:<br />

• In all cases, the Hurst exponents are all greater than 0.5. This<br />

implies a persistent time series characterized by long memory effects.<br />

• It is very <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to see that, when the expectation of log(R/S) is<br />

used for Hurst exponent estimation, the Hurst exponents for both<br />

frequency and resistance <strong>signal</strong>s are the same! This might not be<br />

surpris<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce both <strong>signal</strong>s are affected by the same evaporation<br />

dynamics.<br />

• With the target, the Hurst exponent for Case-3 is even smaller than<br />

that of the Case-1. This deserves a good explanation.<br />

• The Hurst exponents obta<strong>in</strong>ed can be served as a quantitative<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator to differentiate different cases such as different<br />

concentrations, difference biological materials, different<br />

bioreactions, and etc.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University


Slide-18<br />

Future work<br />

• <strong>Fractional</strong> <strong>order</strong> <strong>signal</strong> <strong>process<strong>in</strong>g</strong> for<br />

–EIS<br />

–ECN<br />

–QCM<br />

–etc.<br />

4/19/2005 <strong>Fractional</strong> Order Calculus Day at Utah State University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!