22.07.2013 Views

Smeagol

Smeagol

Smeagol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Developed in Trinity College Dublin in<br />

collaboration with groups from<br />

Oviedo in Spain and Lancaster in the UK<br />

• Based on the DFT code SIESTA<br />

• <strong>Smeagol</strong>: Rocha et. al., PRB 73,<br />

085414 (2006);<br />

Nature Materials 4, 335, (2005).<br />

• SIESTA: Sanchez­Portal et. al.,<br />

Int. J. Quant. Chem., 65, 453 (1997);<br />

Soler et. al., Jour. Phys.: Condens. Matter,<br />

14, 2745 (2002).<br />

Non­Equilibrium Electronic Transport<br />

gDFTB<br />

• Developed in University of Rome<br />

Tor Vergata<br />

• Based on DFTB – DFT based tight­binding<br />

• gDFTB: A. Pecchia and A. di Carlo, Rep.<br />

Prog. Phys. 67, 1497, (2004).<br />

• DFTB: D. Porezag, Th. Frauenheim,<br />

Th. Kohler, G. Seifert, and R. Kaschner,<br />

Phys. Rev. B 51, 12947, (1995).


DFT DOS Results for PTCDA<br />

• DOS for PTCDA flat on Ag surface with periodic boundary conditions in each direction.<br />

• Tip­surface distance is 5.0 Angstrom.<br />

• Silver described by 4d5s basis set.


DFT DOS Results for PTCDA<br />

• DOS for PTCDA peeled up from Ag surface (tip – surface separation is 12 Angstrom)<br />

with periodic boundary conditions in each direction.


DFT DOS Results for PTCDA<br />

• DOS showing change in molecular orbitals (carbon pi orbitals) as molecule is peeled<br />

off silver surface.<br />

• As the molecule is peeled up, the molecular orbitals increase in energy, shifting<br />

upwards towards the Fermi level of the substrate.


Transmission Results for PTCDA from gDFTB<br />

• Transmission coefficients for PTCDA on Ag surface from gDFTB.<br />

• Resonance due to LUMO of molecule starts out 1eV below Fermi level, and then<br />

moves up due to the reverse chemisorption effect.


Transmission Results for PTCDA from <strong>Smeagol</strong><br />

• Transmission coefficients for PTCDA on Ag surface from <strong>Smeagol</strong>.<br />

• Similar to the gDFTB results, the resonance due to LUMO of molecule starts out<br />

1eV below Fermi level, and then moves up due to the reverse chemisorption effect.


Local DOS at Transmission Resonances<br />

HOMO<br />

LUMO LUMO + 1<br />

• Density of states isosurface for PTCDA flat on Ag surface in energy windows around<br />

transmission resonances.<br />

• Transmission resonances mostly correspond to pi orbitals on C and O atoms.


DOS on Oxygen atoms<br />

• HOMO and LUMO of PTCDA includes pi orbitals on carboxylic atoms but not on<br />

anhydride atoms – also apparent from local DOS on previous slide.


Comparison of gDFTB and <strong>Smeagol</strong> Results<br />

• Transmission coefficients for PTCDA flat on Ag surface ­ comparison between gDFTB<br />

and <strong>Smeagol</strong> results.<br />

• Methods match well below Fermi level, not so well above Fermi level – may be due<br />

to problems with DFT and unoccupied states. Also, sharp peak in transmission at Fermi<br />

level does not appear to be present in the <strong>Smeagol</strong> results.


DOS of STM Tip from DFTB<br />

5 Ang separation 12 Ang separation<br />

• DOS for atoms in pyramid<br />

representing STM tip.<br />

• Spike in DOS in pyramid is<br />

present for all tip positions.<br />

• This may be responsible for spike<br />

in transmission in gDFTB results.


DOS of STM Tip from SIESTA<br />

• DOS for four silver atoms in pyramid representing STM tip.<br />

• DOS due to d orbitals is far from Fermi level.<br />

• Small peak near Fermi level due s orbital on atom at end of tip.


DOS of STM Tip<br />

• Density of states isosurface for orbitals in energy region indicated by orange lines.<br />

• Orbitals at this energy localized around tip and surface.<br />

• Also some states present on molecule in this energy region.


Conductance as a Function of Tip Position<br />

gDFTB Current<br />

<strong>Smeagol</strong> Conductance<br />

Experiment: Nanotechnology 19, 065401, (2008)<br />

• Conductance at Fermi level for PTCDA on Ag surface from <strong>Smeagol</strong>.<br />

• Large difference between experimental and computational results: in experiment,<br />

conductance increases rapidly to a maximum and then falls off. In computational<br />

results, conductance falls at first and then increases.


Conductance as a Function of Tip Position<br />

• Comparison between low bias conductance for experimental results and results<br />

from both <strong>Smeagol</strong> and gDFTB.<br />

• Order of magnitude of maximum is similar for all results, however maximum for<br />

experimental result is at minimum of theory results.


3 Layer<br />

5 Layer PBC<br />

• PRB 76, 115421, (2007)<br />

DFT DOS Results for PTCDA<br />

• DOS for carbon pz orbitals (z is direction perpendicular to surface) for PTCDA on 3<br />

and 5 layers of silver. The STM tip and periodic boundary conditions in the z direction are<br />

present for the 5 layer system.<br />

• The calculations described in PRB 76, 115421 were done with 3 silver layers, and the<br />

DOS for PTCDA on 3 layers most closely resembles the results present in that paper.


5 Layer PBC<br />

• PRB 76, 115421, (2007)<br />

DFT DOS Results for PTCDA<br />

• DOS for carbon pz orbitals (z is direction perpendicular to surface) for PTCDA on 5 layers<br />

of silver with periodic boundary conditions.<br />

• LDA calculations predict a geometrical configuration where the molecule is 0.2 to 0.3<br />

Angstroms closer to the surface than is seen in experiment.<br />

• Altering the position of the molecule by this distance has a large effect on the DOS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!