22.07.2013 Views

4 Coulomb blockade

4 Coulomb blockade

4 Coulomb blockade

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 4 <strong>Coulomb</strong> <strong>blockade</strong><br />

4.4 <strong>Coulomb</strong> <strong>blockade</strong> in quantum dots<br />

Here we want to consider the <strong>Coulomb</strong> <strong>blockade</strong> in intermediate-size quantum<br />

dots, where the typical energy level spacing ∆ɛ is not too small to neglect it<br />

completely, but the number of levels is large enough, so that one can use the<br />

constant-interaction model (4.17), which we write in the eigenstate basis as<br />

ˆHCIM = <br />

α<br />

˜ɛαd † αdα + E(n), (4.46)<br />

where the charging energy E(n) is determined in the same way as previously,<br />

for example by the expression (4.16). Note, that for quantum dots it is not<br />

convenient to incorporate the gate voltage into the free electrostatic energy<br />

(4.24), as we did before for metallic islands, also the usage of classical capacitance<br />

is not well established, although for large quantum dots it is possible.<br />

Instead, we shift the energy levels in the dot ˜ɛα = ɛα + eϕα by the electrical<br />

potential<br />

ϕα = VG + VR + ηα(VL − VR), (4.47)<br />

where ηα are some coefficients, dependent on geometry. This method can be<br />

easily extended to include any self-consistent effects on the mean-field level by<br />

the help of the Poisson equation (instead of classical capacitances). Besides,<br />

if all ηα are the same, our approach reproduce again the relevant part of the<br />

classical expressions (4.23), (4.24)<br />

ÊCIM = <br />

ɛαnα + E(n)+enϕext. (4.48)<br />

α<br />

The addition energy now depends not only on the charge of the molecule,<br />

but also on the state |α〉, in which the electron is added<br />

∆E + nα(n, nα =0→ n +1,nα =1)=E(n +1)− E(n)+ɛα, (4.49)<br />

we can assume in this case, that the single particle energies are additive to the<br />

charging energy, so that the full quantum eigenstate of the system is |n, ˆn〉,<br />

where the set ˆn ≡{nα} shows weather the particular single-particle state |α〉<br />

is empty or occupied. Some arbitrary state ˆn looks like<br />

ˆn ≡{nα} ≡ n1,n2,n3,n4,n5, ... = 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, ... . (4.50)<br />

Note, that the distribution ˆn defines also n = <br />

α nα. It is convenient, however,<br />

to keep notation n to remember about the charge state of a system,<br />

below we use both notations |n, ˆn〉 and short one |ˆn〉 as equivalent.<br />

The other important point is that the distribution function fn(α) inthe<br />

charge state |n〉 is not assumed to be equilibrium, as previously (this condition<br />

is not specific to quantum dots with discrete energy levels, the distribution<br />

function in metallic islands can also be nonequilibrium. However, in the parameter<br />

range, typical for classical <strong>Coulomb</strong> <strong>blockade</strong>, the tunneling time is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!