23.07.2013 Views

Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: An ...

Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: An ...

Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: An ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 5 Throughput <strong>of</strong> receiving bits<br />

2. Throughput <strong>of</strong> dropping bits: At 55 simulation seconds the number <strong>of</strong> dropped bits in<br />

TORA is the maximum 17X 10 4 bits/sec, the AODV has a 9.5X10 4 dropped bit rate, and DSR has<br />

almost no dropped bits. (Figure 6)<br />

Figure 6 Throughput <strong>of</strong> dropping bits<br />

3. Throughput <strong>of</strong> sending bits versus average simulation end to end delays. Initially<br />

all three algorithms show some transmission delay. DSR has the highest delay <strong>of</strong> about 2.0<br />

simulated seconds, AODV has a lower delay <strong>of</strong> about 0.7 simulated seconds, and TORA has the<br />

least (about 0.3 simulated seconds) when the throughput <strong>of</strong> sending bits is less than 1X10 5<br />

bits/seconds (Figure 7). In AODV the delay is highest at 1.4 simulated seconds when throughput<br />

is 1.5X10 5 bits/second. For AODV and TORA the delay stops when throughput is 3X10 5<br />

bits/second, but continues for DSR until the transmission ends.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!