Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: An ...
Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: An ...
Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: An ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 5 Throughput <strong>of</strong> receiving bits<br />
2. Throughput <strong>of</strong> dropping bits: At 55 simulation seconds the number <strong>of</strong> dropped bits in<br />
TORA is the maximum 17X 10 4 bits/sec, the AODV has a 9.5X10 4 dropped bit rate, and DSR has<br />
almost no dropped bits. (Figure 6)<br />
Figure 6 Throughput <strong>of</strong> dropping bits<br />
3. Throughput <strong>of</strong> sending bits versus average simulation end to end delays. Initially<br />
all three algorithms show some transmission delay. DSR has the highest delay <strong>of</strong> about 2.0<br />
simulated seconds, AODV has a lower delay <strong>of</strong> about 0.7 simulated seconds, and TORA has the<br />
least (about 0.3 simulated seconds) when the throughput <strong>of</strong> sending bits is less than 1X10 5<br />
bits/seconds (Figure 7). In AODV the delay is highest at 1.4 simulated seconds when throughput<br />
is 1.5X10 5 bits/second. For AODV and TORA the delay stops when throughput is 3X10 5<br />
bits/second, but continues for DSR until the transmission ends.