23.07.2013 Views

Asymptotic behaviour of the Kazdan-Warner solution in the annulus ∗

Asymptotic behaviour of the Kazdan-Warner solution in the annulus ∗

Asymptotic behaviour of the Kazdan-Warner solution in the annulus ∗

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In ([NN]) Ni and Nussbaum proved <strong>the</strong> uniqueness <strong>of</strong> this <strong>solution</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

class <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> radial function.<br />

In this paper we study <strong>the</strong> asymptotic <strong>behaviour</strong> <strong>of</strong> this <strong>solution</strong> as p → ∞.<br />

We hope that this analysis, which is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g itself, give some useful ideas<br />

to deduce existence results to (1.1) for p large when Ω is a non-spherical doma<strong>in</strong><br />

(for example <strong>the</strong> case where Ω has one hole).<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper is that <strong>the</strong>re is no concentration phenomenon<br />

as p goes to <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity. This is <strong>in</strong> sharp contrast with similar semil<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

perturbed problems and also with problems <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same nonl<strong>in</strong>earity <strong>in</strong><br />

R 2 (see ([AG]), ([EG]), ([RW1]), ([RW2]). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand we have some<br />

similarities with a different problem studied <strong>in</strong> ([BM]).<br />

Our first result concerns <strong>the</strong> convergence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>solution</strong> up <strong>of</strong> (1.1). In <strong>the</strong><br />

rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper Ω will denote <strong>the</strong> <strong>annulus</strong> Ω = {x ∈ R N : 0 < a < |x| < b}.<br />

Theorem 1.1. Let up <strong>the</strong> unique radial <strong>solution</strong> <strong>of</strong> (1.1). Then, as p → ∞,<br />

with<br />

ω(|x|) =<br />

2<br />

a 2−N − b 2−N<br />

up(|x|) → ω(|x|) <strong>in</strong> C 0 (Ω), (1.2)<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ a2−N − |x| 2−N for a ≤ |x| ≤ r0<br />

⎪⎩<br />

|x| 2−N − b2−N for r0 ≤ |x| ≤ b<br />

and<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ log |x| − log a for a ≤ |x| ≤ r0<br />

2<br />

ω(|x|) =<br />

log b − log a ⎪⎩<br />

log b − log |x| for r0 ≤ |x| ≤ b<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally r0 is given by<br />

⎧<br />

1<br />

2−N 2−N 2−N<br />

⎪⎨<br />

a +b<br />

2 if N ≥ 3<br />

r0 =<br />

⎪⎩ √<br />

ab if N = 2<br />

for N ≥ 3 (1.3)<br />

for N = 2 (1.4)<br />

(1.5)<br />

Note that ω is not differentiable at r0 and ω(r0) = max ω(r)=1. Hence <strong>the</strong><br />

r∈[a,b]<br />

previous <strong>the</strong>orem provide <strong>the</strong> limit position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> set <strong>of</strong> maxima <strong>of</strong> up.<br />

A first estimate <strong>of</strong> this type can be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pioneer<strong>in</strong>g paper <strong>of</strong> Gidas,<br />

Ni and Nirenberg (see [GNN], Theorem 2 and example <strong>in</strong> page 223). Note that<br />

<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> r0 for N = 2 <strong>in</strong> Theorem 1.1 shows that <strong>the</strong> estimate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> example<br />

<strong>of</strong> page 223 <strong>of</strong> [GNN] is not sharp for <strong>the</strong> nonl<strong>in</strong>earity f(s) = sp .<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r result concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maxima if p = N+2<br />

found <strong>in</strong> [Pa].<br />

Now we denote by Ga,b(r, s) <strong>the</strong> Green’s function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operator<br />

−u ′′ −<br />

N − 1<br />

u<br />

r<br />

′ , r ∈ (a, b),<br />

2<br />

N−2<br />

can be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!