25.07.2013 Views

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At the present time there is dire need <strong>for</strong> all Church and school authorities to drive this vile “doctrines of<br />

devils” (I Tim. 4:1) out of all pulpits and classrooms, and to purge our fair land from this vileness. Let all<br />

lovers of truth and youth unite in a holy crusade <strong>for</strong> the restoration of the Bible to its rightful place of honor<br />

in the schools and colleges of the nation, and <strong>for</strong> the eradication of this loathsome mental leprosy which has<br />

recently become a world calamity. Only in Christ is there healing <strong>for</strong> this deadly disease. [1924:226]<br />

Baptist preacher J. Frank Norris of Texas called evolution “the most damnable<br />

doctrine that has come out of the bottomless pit”; and vowed, in testimony be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

Texas legislature when it was considering a bill banning the teaching of evolution, to<br />

resist “that hell-born, Bible-destroying, deity-of-Christ-denying, German rationalism<br />

known as evolution,” and to “drive the theory of evolution out of church and public<br />

schools in all states” (quoted in Shipley 1927:171-172,177).<br />

The anti-evolutionist fundamentalists were not engaged as much in a “war against<br />

modern science” as Shipley and others have supposed, but they definitely felt they were<br />

waging a war against something. Shipley’s War on Modern <strong>Science</strong> (1927), and, be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

that, Andrew White’s History of the Warfare of <strong>Science</strong> with Theology in Christendom<br />

(1896) and John Draper’s History of the Conflict Between Religion and <strong>Science</strong> (1875),<br />

exaggerated the warfare motif in more ways than one, since many theologians and<br />

religious believers had always tried to accommodate their religion to scientific doctrines,<br />

and even the fundamentalists considered themselves advocates of “true science” (though<br />

they did oppose much of modern scientific theory). But in any case, the fundamentalists<br />

themselves insisted on militant metaphors of warfare and battles to the death against<br />

evolution and other Satanic threats to religion and society.<br />

Meanwhile, throughout the decades which saw the spectacular rise of<br />

fundamentalist influence and activism, George McCready Price, with his insistence on<br />

literal, recent creationism and his re-invention of Flood Geology, was providing a<br />

plausible-sounding basis <strong>for</strong> a “scientific” strict creationism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!