Creationism - National Center for Science Education
Creationism - National Center for Science Education
Creationism - National Center for Science Education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
were hidden underground. The Flood buried immense <strong>for</strong>ests which <strong>for</strong>med today’s coal<br />
and oil deposits. White stressed that the Flood catastrophe is a warning of the coming<br />
destruction of the world prior to the imminent second Advent or Coming of Christ.<br />
Price attended Battle Creek College, the Seventh-day Adventist institution in<br />
Michigan, then taught school in his native Canada. He taught himself geology in order to<br />
refute evolution and prove literal creation, and became a science professor at various<br />
Adventist colleges in Nebraska and Washington, and at the College of Medical<br />
Evangelists in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia (now Loma Linda University, famed <strong>for</strong> its medical school).<br />
In his Outline of Modern <strong>Science</strong> and Modern Christianity, published by “Modern<br />
Heretic Co.” in 1902 (Modern Heretic happens to have the same address as Price’s home<br />
in Los Angeles), Price first presented his major Flood Geology arguments, including the<br />
central claim that the geological record does not prove a succession of ages, but rather<br />
shows a “taxonomic” series representing different but contemporaneous zones of<br />
antediluvian life. He continued to campaign <strong>for</strong> creationism in dozens of books into the<br />
second half of the century. In his 1902 work he discussed:<br />
The Evolution Theory in its whole range, from the Nebulous Cloud, the Cooling Earth, and the Origin of<br />
Life, through Geology and Biology up to the Moral Nature of Man, Carefully discussed in a Popular Style.<br />
No one, after reading it, could <strong>for</strong> a moment suppose that the Evolution Theory had been proved by sound<br />
scientific arguments, while the moral and religious tendencies of the doctrine are shown to be anti-Christian<br />
to the last degree.<br />
Price urged a return to “primitive” Christianity, including belief in the plain interpretation<br />
of the Creation narrative:<br />
No believer in the Sabbath as the divine memorial of creation’s week will hesitate to give as the distinct,<br />
positive teaching of Genesis that life has been on our globe only some six or seven thousand years; and that<br />
the earth as we know it, with its teeming animal and vegetable life, was brought into existence in six literal<br />
days.<br />
Price enthusiastically expanded on his refutation of modern geology and advocacy<br />
of Flood Geology in a 1906 booklet Illogical Geology: The Weakest Point in the<br />
Evolution Theory, also published at home by Modern Heretic. In it he offered $1000 <strong>for</strong><br />
proof of any difference in the age of fossils. His major thesis is a denial of the Wernerian<br />
“onion-skin” hypothesis 9 of rock strata: the assumption of worldwide orderly<br />
superposition of successive strata. Arguing instead that the different fossil assemblages<br />
represent different (but contemporaneous) ecological zones, he insisted that geological<br />
strata can and do appear in any order whatsoever—that the alleged “geological column”<br />
is a myth. “Illogical Geology” was the title of an 1890 essay by Herbert Spencer.<br />
Spencer, though an evolutionist, also rejected the assumption of Werner’s Neptunian<br />
onion-coat theory that the same type of rock was deposited worldwide <strong>for</strong> each era. Price<br />
complained that modern geologists had abandoned Werner’s Neptunian version, only to<br />
substitute <strong>for</strong> it a modern biological version in which worldwide successive layers as<br />
defined by index fossils are still assumed without warrant.)<br />
“Inductive geology can never prove creation,” Price conceded. But, he<br />
proclaimed, it “removes <strong>for</strong>ever the succession-of-life idea,” thus clearing the way <strong>for</strong><br />
9 Price, defending true science against speculative theories, says of Werner (1923:592): “In all this<br />
speculation, he was, of course, wandering far from true inductive methods. Quite likely he never heard of Bacon’s<br />
Novum Organum or Newton’s Principia.”