25.07.2013 Views

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

This is a study of the creationist movement emphasizing creationism as a belief<br />

system. I present and examine many of the ideas and theories of the creationists in an<br />

attempt to understand how these beliefs fit together with other aspects of religious<br />

fundamentalism, and to understand the reasons why evolution is so strongly opposed. In<br />

doing so I assume that these beliefs follow some sort of logic and <strong>for</strong>m a more or less<br />

coherent and understandable system. The actual fundamentalist religious beliefs, and<br />

their origins, must be taken into account in order to understand the intellectual<br />

background of creationist belief.<br />

In the first chapter I examine some of these beliefs and show how they<br />

contributed to the rise of fundamentalist opposition to evolution. In the second chapter I<br />

discuss the nature of early twentieth-century creationism, be<strong>for</strong>e, during, and after the<br />

heyday of fundamentalist activity in the 1920s. The third chapter is a description of the<br />

modern creationist movement. The fourth chapter discusses some theoretical issues<br />

involving various fundamentalist attitudes regarding the relationship of science and<br />

religion. The last two chapters emphasize the diversity of creationist belief: religious,<br />

national, and social diversity, plus the varying degrees of literalism (chapter five); and<br />

finally the various different major types of creationism (chapter six).<br />

My own research has been of two main types: “participant observation” and<br />

extensive study of creationist literature. My “participant observation” has included<br />

graduate-level courses and field trips at the Institute <strong>for</strong> Creation Research, which is<br />

generally acknowledged as the leading “creation-science” institution. I have described a<br />

week-long field trip to the Grand Canyon, which was offered as a graduate-level biology/<br />

geology ICR field study course, in a separate article (McIver 1987a). Also, I have taken<br />

a graduate-level science education course at ICR, attended several ICR Summer<br />

Institutes, and have spent much time reading and studying in the ICR Library, the ICR<br />

Museum, and elsewhere on campus. Besides this considerable time at ICR, I have<br />

attended several <strong>National</strong> (and International) Creation Conferences (Cleveland,<br />

Pittsburgh, Seattle), plus many meetings of local creationist groups, and a variety of other<br />

creationist activities.<br />

My other primary source of in<strong>for</strong>mation has been a very wide-ranging study of<br />

creationist literature. In fact, almost as soon as I began spending time at the ICR Library,<br />

which has an extensive collection of creationist materials (very likely the best and most<br />

comprehensive collection anywhere), I realized that this kind of material merited far<br />

more attention. Analyses of creationism have overwhelmingly tended to focus on an<br />

extremely narrow range of creationist thought and literature—usually just a few books by<br />

ICR members or a few other prominent creation-science leaders. These are certainly the<br />

most important: they have had by far the greatest effect on the public. They are also quite<br />

widely known now. But my attention was drawn to the seemingly limitless numbers of<br />

other, lesser known works attacking evolution. These, I felt, were significant in part<br />

because of their sheer number, and because of the fascinating (and usually little-known)<br />

diversity they exhibited. The older literature (some of it readily available; much of it not)<br />

shed light on the background of the contemporary creation-science movement—the<br />

origins of the ideas which make up creationist theory. The newer literature demonstrates<br />

the myriad <strong>for</strong>ms opposition to evolution can take, and expresses the often surprising and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!