25.07.2013 Views

Numerical analysis of time discretization of optimal control problems

Numerical analysis of time discretization of optimal control problems

Numerical analysis of time discretization of optimal control problems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Theorem 1 (Poincaré). Let H(p,q) : R 2n → R be <strong>of</strong> class C 2 . Then the<br />

associated Hamiltonian flow is symplectic.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Denote the flow by ϕt. The amount Ψt := ∂ϕt(y0)/∂y0 is solution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the variational equation, and hence, skipping the arguments <strong>of</strong> H:<br />

d<br />

dt (Ψt·JΨt) = ˙ Ψt·JΨt+Ψt·J ˙ Ψt = ΨtD 2 HJ −⊤ JΨt+Ψt·JD 2 HΨt = 0,<br />

since J −⊤ J −1 is the identity matrix. Therefore Ψt·JΨt is invariant along<br />

the trajectory, and hence, equal to its initial value J, as was to be proved.<br />

<br />

Theorem 2 (Bochev-Scovel 1994). The partitioned Runge-Kutta schemes<br />

derived from the <strong>optimal</strong>ity system are symplectic.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!