26.07.2013 Views

The Single Income Tax - The 2020 Tax Commission

The Single Income Tax - The 2020 Tax Commission

The Single Income Tax - The 2020 Tax Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> overall economic results would be impressive. Dynamic modelling by the<br />

Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) has found that, if the measures<br />

were introduced with no spending cuts:<br />

■ After five years, GDP would be 1.8 per cent higher; business investment<br />

would be 14.6 per cent higher; and public sector net borrowing would<br />

be £23.1 billion a year higher.<br />

■ After 10 years, GDP would be 5.9 per cent higher; business investment<br />

would be 26.0 per cent higher; and public sector net borrowing would<br />

be £6.9 billion a year higher.<br />

■ After 15 years, GDP would be 8.4 per cent higher; business investment<br />

would be 61.2 per cent higher; and public sector net borrowing would<br />

be £35 billion a year lower.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposals would need to be phased in and/or accompanied by further<br />

restraint in public spending, but the economic results are impressive. <strong>The</strong> increase<br />

in GDP of 8.4 per cent after 15 years is equivalent to an additional nearly £5,000 per<br />

family in 2012–13.2<br />

Chapter 2 looks at the background: how the government finances its spending;<br />

how spending and taxes have increased across the developed world; how spending<br />

and taxes have increased particularly dramatically in Britain recently; how the<br />

complexity of taxes exacerbates that burden; and the philosophical approaches to<br />

understanding ethical concerns raised by tax policy that will be used throughout<br />

the report.<br />

After that, the remaining chapters look at each of the proposed changes, setting<br />

out the results that can be expected, the reasons they are needed and a detailed<br />

explanation of how the new taxes could be implemented.<br />

1.1. Implementing the <strong>2020</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>’s<br />

overall proposals can be practical, productive<br />

and fiscally responsible<br />

While the rest of this report looks at the evidence for the likely economic effects<br />

of the individual <strong>2020</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> proposals, the CEBR has also looked at<br />

the overall effect using the dynamic model of the UK economy it developed for<br />

an earlier <strong>Tax</strong>Payers’ Alliance report.3 <strong>The</strong> nature of that dynamic modelling,<br />

and the impressive results, are set out in Section 1.1.1.<br />

After that, Section 1.1.2 looks briefly at the transitional arrangements that might<br />

be needed to implement the <strong>2020</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> proposals.<br />

1.1.1. <strong>The</strong> overall economic results of the <strong>2020</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />

recommendations<br />

<strong>The</strong> CEBR points out that modelling of this kind is a more approximate process than<br />

normal economic modelling because the academic research tends to show that most<br />

of the behavioural changes only take place after a long period of time. Because they<br />

take so long to appear fully, their impacts tend to be difficult to test statistically and<br />

2. Based on 8.4 per cent of 2012–13 nominal GDP, which was estimated to be £1,576 billion<br />

in Budget 2012.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> dynamic impact of the 2007 Budget and a comparison with the impact of gradually introducing<br />

an Irish level of corporation tax, <strong>Tax</strong>Payers’ Alliance, April 2007<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>Payers’ Alliance | Institute of Directors 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!