ThorEA - Towards an Alternative Nuclear Future.pdf
ThorEA - Towards an Alternative Nuclear Future.pdf
ThorEA - Towards an Alternative Nuclear Future.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.2 Inward investment<br />
The delivery of a thorium based ADSR system in adv<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
of conventional Generation IV reactors would place the<br />
UK at the forefront of nuclear energy generation. Such<br />
international leadership will inevitably result in inward<br />
investment opportunities for the UK. Indeed, the proposed<br />
accelerator-based technology outlined in this report has<br />
already generated considerable interest from the Norwegi<strong>an</strong><br />
owned engineering comp<strong>an</strong>y Aker Solutions which has a UK<br />
base in the North East of Engl<strong>an</strong>d. Aker Solutions level of<br />
commitment to develop a thorium fuelled ADSR is signific<strong>an</strong>t<br />
<strong>an</strong>d the comp<strong>an</strong>y has indicated that if suitable partners c<strong>an</strong><br />
be found (public or private), it would aim to design, build<br />
<strong>an</strong>d commission a full-scale reactor within the UK by 2030.<br />
Aker Solutions is in the process of seeking development<br />
partners within the UK including accelerator science <strong>an</strong>d<br />
technology developers, as well as industrial partners from the<br />
nuclear engineering sector. If such a reactor was to be built,<br />
Aker Solutions has indicated that the UK would be a preferred<br />
location. This level of engagement already demonstrates the<br />
potential inward investment opportunity which the project<br />
would attract, from both the nuclear reactor perspective <strong>an</strong>d<br />
the leading-edge platform technologies which would have to be<br />
developed to achieve the ambitious aims detailed in this report.<br />
5.3 Regional development<br />
The regional development agency Yorkshire Forward, at<br />
the request of the then Science Minister, Lord Sainsbury,<br />
commissioned a report by Arthur D.Little on the economic<br />
impact of large scale facility, i.e. the Europe<strong>an</strong> Spallation<br />
Source, on the Yorkshire region, (Little, 2005). The<br />
socioeconomic <strong>an</strong>alysis showed that not only did the majority<br />
of the investment stay within the region during construction,<br />
a large percentage also remained during operation. The ongoing<br />
benefit <strong>an</strong>d legacy was found to be m<strong>an</strong>y multiples of<br />
the investment with a ‘cluster’ of comp<strong>an</strong>ies following such<br />
investment. The report demonstrates this through reference<br />
to other large scale projects around the world (SNS – USA,<br />
ANSLS – Australia, CLS – C<strong>an</strong>ada).<br />
Given that the culmination of the AESIR accelerator<br />
development programme would be a “large scale facility”<br />
similar in scope <strong>an</strong>d application to those at TRIUMF (V<strong>an</strong>couver,<br />
C<strong>an</strong>ada) <strong>an</strong>d PSI (Villigen Switzerl<strong>an</strong>d) the socioeconomic<br />
adv<strong>an</strong>tage to the host region could be signific<strong>an</strong>t, although<br />
Little cautioned that such benefits would be much reduced<br />
if the facility was located in <strong>an</strong> economically heated region<br />
(e.g. the Thames Valley).<br />
A report prepared by: the thorium energy amplifier association 43