Fatigue behaviour of BS 2L65 aluminium alloy pin - aerade
Fatigue behaviour of BS 2L65 aluminium alloy pin - aerade
Fatigue behaviour of BS 2L65 aluminium alloy pin - aerade
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6<br />
(d) Constant amplitude loading over a range <strong>of</strong> stress amplitudes at one tensile<br />
mean stress°<br />
(e) Narrow Band Random loading at two rms levels <strong>of</strong> alternating stress and one<br />
tensile mean stress.<br />
Specimens were tested to failure or 10 7 cycles, whichever occurred first.<br />
Cracks were initiated by fretting between the bush and lug hole and led to<br />
failure through the net section. A typical failure is shown in Fig 4.<br />
The following table details the locations <strong>of</strong> the tabulated results and<br />
associated S-N curves for each condition.<br />
Form <strong>of</strong> Loading<br />
Constant amplitude<br />
~R<br />
tt<br />
It<br />
t! !I<br />
T! It<br />
It<br />
Mean<br />
stress<br />
MN/m 2<br />
153 (95)<br />
153 (95)<br />
225 (14o)<br />
153 (95)<br />
153 (95)<br />
153 (95)<br />
153 (95)<br />
225 (14o)<br />
Prestress<br />
gN/m 2<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
4o2 (25o)<br />
474 (294)<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Bushes<br />
passivated<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
No<br />
No<br />
No<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
Table<br />
No.<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
Fig No.<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
i<br />
Fig No. <strong>of</strong><br />
comparison<br />
I0<br />
i ii i,<br />
8 ~13<br />
The S-N curves are based on a faired line passing as close as possible to<br />
the log mean endurances at each stress level. All failed specimens are indicated<br />
on these figures by a circle and dot, whilst a circle with an arrow indicates an<br />
unbroken specimen.<br />
In Figs 10-13 where comparisons are made <strong>of</strong> results under different condi-<br />
tions, individual test points are omitted for clarity.<br />
The unbushed lug data plotted in the comparison graphs, Figs 11-13, were<br />
obtained in an earlier investigation 8 and only the faired S-N curves are<br />
presented in this report.