PERSISTENCE OF THE LATIN ACCENT IN THE NOMINAL ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5-30 Prosodic outcomes of declension 2/4 tetrasyllables with antepenultimate accent...........302 5-31 Prosodic outcomes of declension 3 tetrasyllables with antepenultimate accent..............303 5-32 Outputs of declension 2/4 pentasyllables with penultimate accent. ................................307 5-33 Portuguese outputs of third declension pentasyllabic nouns with suffixes -tāte(m) and -tūdō .................................................................................................................................308 5-34 Catalan and Castilian outputs of third declension pentasyllabic nouns with suffixes -tāte(m) and -tūdō ............................................................................................................309 5-35 Realignment of syllables, moras, and segments in outputs of suffix -ione(m) in Catalan, Castilian, and Portuguese...................................................................................311 5-36 Outcomes of third declension pentasyllables with suffix -iōne(m). ................................313 5-37 Outcomes of third declension pentasyllables with suffix -ōre(m)...................................314 5-38 Outcomes of second declension pentasyllables with antepenultimate accent and heavy initial syllable. .......................................................................................................317 5-39 Outcomes of second declension pentasyllables with antepenultimate accent and LH initial syllables. ................................................................................................................319 5-40 Outcomes of second declension pentasyllables with antepenultimate accent and all light syllables. ..................................................................................................................321 6-1 Prosodic outcomes of all 2-syllable and 3-syllable first declension nouns with penultimate accent ...........................................................................................................323 6-2 Outcomes of all first declension tetrasyllables with penultimate accent. ........................327 6-3 Outcomes of all first declension pentasyllables with penultimate accent........................329 6-4 Distribution of heavy and light syllables in tonic and word initial position in nouns derived from the first declension. ....................................................................................330 6-5 Prosodic outcomes of all 3-syllable first declension nouns with antepenultimate accent . .............................................................................................................................332 6-6 Prosodic outcomes of all 4-syllable first declension nouns with antepenultimate accent . .............................................................................................................................334 6-7 Distribution of heavy/light syllables in initial and tonic positions of all nouns with antepenultimate accent from the first declension.............................................................337 6-8 Distribution of heavy/light syllables in initial and tonic positions of all nouns with penultimate accent from the first declension. ..................................................................338 18
6-9 Outcomes of disyllablic nouns with penultimate acent in declensions 2, 3, 4.................339 6-10 Prosodic templates from declension 2/4 trisyllables with penultimate accent. ...............347 6-11 Prosodic templates from declension 3 trisyllables with penultimate accent....................348 6-12 Prosodic templates from declension 2/4 trisyllables with antepenultimate accent..........349 6-13 Prosodic templates from declension 3 trisyllables with antepenultimate accent.............350 6-14 Preferred templates for nouns of one and two syllables. .................................................351 6-15 Preferred templates for nouns of three syllables with penultimate accent.......................355 6-16 Preferred templates for nouns of three syllables with antepenultimate accent................357 6-17 Preferred templates for nouns of three syllables with ultimate accent. ...........................359 6-18 Preferred template for nouns of four syllables with penultimate accent. ........................360 6-19 Preferred template for nouns of four syllables with antepenultimate accent...................362 B-1 Skeleton to grid association of a superheavy syllable. ....................................................370 B-2 Perfect Grid L → R (Cairene Arabic)..............................................................................371 B-3 QS and stress assignment (Latin).....................................................................................371 C-1 Metrical analysis of a line of Saturnian verse..................................................................375 19
Page 1 and 2: PERSISTENCE OF THE LATIN ACCENT IN
Page 3 and 4: To the memory of my parents, Manuel
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .
Page 7 and 8: Four-syllable Nouns................
Page 9 and 10: 3-5 Vulgar Latin constraints on acc
Page 11 and 12: 4-31 Possible heavy/light syllable
Page 13 and 14: 5-22 Distribution of heavy/light sy
Page 15 and 16: 2-3 Iambic shortening..............
Page 17: 5-13 Relative frequency of 3-syllab
Page 21 and 22: etween primary accent and the segme
Page 23 and 24: of those constraints in the three m
Page 25 and 26: B “this perfect correlation canno
Page 27 and 28: The vowel labeled [+stress] in Figu
Page 29 and 30: The word agreement in Figure 1-6 Li
Page 31 and 32: monosyllable. Therefore, it is mark
Page 33 and 34: specific rules. In the Halle/Vergna
Page 35 and 36: ut of those pieces of a syllable th
Page 37 and 38: and a period indicates non-head ele
Page 39 and 40: With regard to extension, bounded s
Page 41 and 42: patterns B and C; these correspond
Page 43 and 44: In order to achieve the binary patt
Page 45 and 46: output.” The assessment of output
Page 47 and 48: constraints in recognizing universa
Page 49 and 50: glides liquids nasals voiced voicel
Page 51 and 52: It can be seen from Table 1-4 that
Page 53 and 54: discussion). Additionally, initial
Page 55 and 56: Both MAX and DEP have consequences
Page 57 and 58: is the case of syllabic nasals and
Page 59 and 60: Jacobs 1999, 384). Examples of fina
Page 61 and 62: Gradient constraints (Hayes 2000, B
Page 63 and 64: DEPI/O and ROOT-IDENT. However, if
Page 65 and 66: antepenultimate accent was once con
Page 67 and 68: structure, such as constraints on c
Page 69 and 70:
co-occurrence of both pitch and str
Page 71 and 72:
2-2 the first line shows the poetic
Page 73 and 74:
poetry and song is well known in ma
Page 75 and 76:
Table 2-3. Early Latin syncope 1. L
Page 77 and 78:
The OT derivation of pre-classical
Page 79 and 80:
2-5 the results of the new constrai
Page 81 and 82:
Iambic Shortening and Cretic Shorte
Page 83 and 84:
eproduced in Table 2-6, are all two
Page 85 and 86:
there are two underlying, inviolabl
Page 87 and 88:
(nom. sg.), capitis (gen. sg.). Not
Page 89 and 90:
celiandre. However, Portuguese coen
Page 91 and 92:
lengthening to devlop in a language
Page 93 and 94:
‘sorrowful.’ Allen (1973, 137)
Page 95 and 96:
means that not all elements on the
Page 97 and 98:
(2.16) H/R: Align the head foot to
Page 99 and 100:
more successful in learning primary
Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 3 FROM QUANTITY SENSITIVE T
Page 103 and 104:
terminology, it is also characteriz
Page 105 and 106:
Clusters of the type liquid + stop
Page 107 and 108:
one most propitious for syncope, th
Page 109 and 110:
How syncope actually affects the as
Page 111 and 112:
complex codas for Catalan and coda
Page 113 and 114:
ca(pi.clum,), (ar)(ti.clus), (ver)(
Page 115 and 116:
Jacobs’s suggestion of syncope as
Page 117 and 118:
espectively 5 (The other languages
Page 119 and 120:
When the difference is computed as
Page 121 and 122:
città to project two moras to sati
Page 123 and 124:
frequency of occurrence. The invent
Page 125 and 126:
Port. olho; from -g’l-, as in VL
Page 127 and 128:
number of the left corresponds to A
Page 129 and 130:
Apocope Apocope is further evidence
Page 131 and 132:
141 faseolus non fassiolus. Cat. fe
Page 133 and 134:
The authors of the study on Catalan
Page 135 and 136:
(3.6) MAX-IO-V[lo]: If an input V s
Page 137 and 138:
Table 3-16. Latin words of 2 to 5 s
Page 139 and 140:
CHAPTER 4 ACCENTUAL PATTERNS IN THE
Page 141 and 142:
preference for heavy syllables in p
Page 143 and 144:
Sihler (1995, 266-269) notes that t
Page 145 and 146:
to pre-tonic and post-tonic vowels
Page 147 and 148:
appear in shaded cells. Results are
Page 149 and 150:
the resolution of complex internal
Page 151 and 152:
to at least one syllable except for
Page 153 and 154:
In the case of Latin two-syllable w
Page 155 and 156:
Table 4-5. Contingency table for H/
Page 157 and 158:
Lat. tructa, ae, f. ‘trout’ 14
Page 159 and 160:
fronting of preceding vowel, Portug
Page 161 and 162:
stages of Catalan, for example, Old
Page 163 and 164:
232 disyllabic first declension Lat
Page 165 and 166:
HC A) Penultimate Accent HV L B) An
Page 167 and 168:
Table 4-12. Contingency table for H
Page 169 and 170:
The new prosodic template that has
Page 171 and 172:
construct a foot to the left of the
Page 173 and 174:
higher degree of prominence because
Page 175 and 176:
Table 4-16. Tableau for output of f
Page 177 and 178:
100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0%
Page 179 and 180:
eina, rainha (cf. Lloyd 1987, 320);
Page 181 and 182:
provides a pronunciation of [pə'ri
Page 183 and 184:
Table 4-21. Tableau for selection o
Page 185 and 186:
STW (A stressed syllable is bimorai
Page 187 and 188:
suggested that such words may never
Page 189 and 190:
stressed syllable is bimoraic). Mai
Page 191 and 192:
The difference in distribution of h
Page 193 and 194:
100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00%
Page 195 and 196:
heavy; the same situation holds for
Page 197 and 198:
L.L.L1.L. The primary cause of loss
Page 199 and 200:
epresentation of a segment in stand
Page 201 and 202:
violations specific to their langua
Page 203 and 204:
In the input forms in Table 4-37 th
Page 205 and 206:
Combining the results of both group
Page 207 and 208:
‘corner of one’s mouth’ is pr
Page 209 and 210:
Veinte presas H L L H hemos hecho L
Page 211 and 212:
In terms of syllabic loss, the L.L.
Page 213 and 214:
78 cases represented in the data se
Page 215 and 216:
pronounced [əmέʎʎə] and [am
Page 217 and 218:
Catalan (peripheral areas of Centra
Page 219 and 220:
penultimate accent, for example, Ch
Page 221 and 222:
coincide with a morpheme or prefix.
Page 223 and 224:
For the languages in question, then
Page 225 and 226:
morpheme. The second pattern with i
Page 227 and 228:
Because the five-syllable words are
Page 229 and 230:
Surprisingly, Portuguese shows the
Page 231 and 232:
unaccented syllable. It is always m
Page 233 and 234:
CHAPTER FIVE VOWEL LOSS AND THE RIS
Page 235 and 236:
this declension class and feminine
Page 237 and 238:
some cases. The constraints that pr
Page 239 and 240:
high percentage of cases in both Ca
Page 241 and 242:
(5.2) MAX SEGMENT INPUT-OUTPUT (abb
Page 243 and 244:
315) employs the concept of the dem
Page 245 and 246:
glide accounts for the somewhat low
Page 247 and 248:
The effect of demotion of MAX V is
Page 249 and 250:
The locus of primary accent is pred
Page 251 and 252:
nominative and accusative (Gran dic
Page 253 and 254:
108). The final consonant of the CC
Page 255 and 256:
Catalan peu ( Port. exame. As in Ta
Page 257 and 258:
100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0%
Page 259 and 260:
Three-syllable Nouns The outcomes o
Page 261 and 262:
For example, in most varieties of C
Page 263 and 264:
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0%
Page 265 and 266:
to-Head) constraint calls for a hea
Page 267 and 268:
coda-less tonic syllable in aspecto
Page 269 and 270:
20 15 10 5 0 H L H L H L H L S3 S2
Page 271 and 272:
(C)V.'CVC2.C1V → (C)V.'CVC1. Loss
Page 273 and 274:
irmão ‘brother’ (< germānus,
Page 275 and 276:
preference for the two-syllable tem
Page 277 and 278:
and HV syllables are combined. Agai
Page 279 and 280:
-ón and Por. -ão, outcomes of Lat
Page 281 and 282:
100.0% ➊ ➋ ➌ 80.0% 60.0% 40.0
Page 283 and 284:
the HV type syllable in Ibero-Roman
Page 285 and 286:
NOCODACAT, CAS, POR or SONSEQ (in t
Page 287 and 288:
24 20 16 12 8 4 CAT ➊ ➋ 0 H.H.'
Page 289 and 290:
coda position may not be identical
Page 291 and 292:
uniformity in the nature of the fir
Page 293 and 294:
an uneven trochee due to its decrea
Page 295 and 296:
not belong to a learned register wh
Page 297 and 298:
The nine cases of ultimate accent i
Page 299 and 300:
100 80 60 40 20 0 L.L.'L.L ➊ ➎
Page 301 and 302:
that the proposed parsing, L('H), i
Page 303 and 304:
frequent L('H.L.L) (data points 1 a
Page 305 and 306:
learned or semi-learned in nature,
Page 307 and 308:
24 20 16 12 ➌ ➍ 8 ➊ 4 ➋ ➎
Page 309 and 310:
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ➋ ➊ ➌ ,H.
Page 311 and 312:
Classical Latin it is treated here
Page 313 and 314:
Table 5-22. Distribution of heavy/l
Page 315 and 316:
There are few cases of reduction to
Page 317 and 318:
5-35 have a unifying factor, a syll
Page 319 and 320:
eduction strategies seen here, apoc
Page 321 and 322:
5-38, 5-39, 5-40) is a four-syllabl
Page 323 and 324:
CHAPTER SIX PREFERRED PROSODIC TEMP
Page 325 and 326:
Level 2: Assign * to the head foot
Page 327 and 328:
for continuation of a heavy initial
Page 329 and 330:
The set of five-syllable nouns with
Page 331 and 332:
Patterns with Antepenultimate Accen
Page 333 and 334:
that coincide in the three language
Page 335 and 336:
deletion of a pretonic vowel. Thus,
Page 337 and 338:
were disyllabic, then the two most
Page 339 and 340:
locus of accent for Catalan. This i
Page 341 and 342:
verb system as well where verbs of
Page 343 and 344:
positions of non-prominence and rig
Page 345 and 346:
(6.9) Max/front: A vowel in the inp
Page 347 and 348:
250 200 150 100 ➍ 50 0 -50 '
Page 349 and 350:
displacement of accent to the penul
Page 351 and 352:
liebre, Port. lebre (
Page 353 and 354:
Table 6-8. Continued 'L.H L.'H H.'H
Page 355 and 356:
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 CAT CA
Page 357 and 358:
While perhaps not representative of
Page 359 and 360:
180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 C
Page 361 and 362:
input to this preferred template co
Page 363 and 364:
Table 6-13. Distribution and origin
Page 365 and 366:
een shown here that the datasets of
Page 367 and 368:
APPENDIX A APPENDIX PROBI Väänän
Page 369 and 370:
172 anus non anucla. 173 tondeo non
Page 371 and 372:
x Row 2: End Rule (Final, Word) wea
Page 373 and 374:
monstro [mõʃtɾu] and Cat. monstr
Page 375 and 376:
D → F F Each dipode consists of t
Page 377 and 378:
stress-based poetic verse emerges a
Page 379 and 380:
utilize Latin. However, Wright (198
Page 381 and 382:
of bearing an accent. Therefore, fu
Page 383 and 384:
383 Etymon Dcl σ Ac Temp Gen CAT
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
397 Etymon HV.HC1.X (14) Dcl σ Ac
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
405 Etymon HV1.L.X (1) Dcl σ Ac Te
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
411 Etymon HC.HC1.X (1) Dcl σ Ac T
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
419 Etymon HV1.L.X (1) Dcl σ Ac Te
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
443 Etymon L.HC1.X (14) Dcl σ Ac T
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
451 Etymon L.HC1.X (18) Dcl σ Ac T
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
457 Etymon L1.L.X (1) Dcl σ Ac Tem
Page 459 and 460:
459 Etymon L.HC1.X (1) Dcl σ Ac Te
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
467 Etymon L1.L.X (2) Dcl σ Ac Tem
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
475 Etymon HV1.L (43) Dcl σ Ac Tem
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
Page 495 and 496:
Page 497 and 498:
Page 499 and 500:
Page 501 and 502:
Page 503 and 504:
LIST OF REFERENCES Abaurre, Maria B
Page 505 and 506:
Bonet, Eulàlia, and Joan Mascaró.
Page 507 and 508:
Davies, Mark. (2002-2004). Corpus d
Page 509 and 510:
———. 2004. Positional weight
Page 511 and 512:
Hulst, Harry van der, Bernadet Hend
Page 513 and 514:
Lloyd, Paul M. 1987. Historical pho
Page 515 and 516:
———. 2000. Variation and chan
Page 517 and 518:
Saltarelli, Mario. 2003. A constrai
Page 519 and 520:
Yip, Moira. 1991. Coronals, consona
show all

PERSISTENCE OF THE LATIN ACCENT IN THE NOMINAL ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?