The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone - agrilife - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The mission of the JRC-IPTS is to provide customer-driven support to the EU policy-making process by developing science-based responses to policy challenges that have both a socioeconomic as well as a scientific/technological dimension. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Contact information Address: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. E-41092 Seville (Spain) E-mail: jrc-ipts-secretariat@ec.europa.eu Tel.: +34 954488318 Fax: +34 954488300 http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC [PUBSY request] EUR XXXXX LL ISBN X-XXXX-XXXX-X ISSN 1018-5593 DOI XXXXX Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Spain
Page 1: Rural poverty reduction and food se
Page 5 and 6: V ACRONYMS CAADP Comprehensive Afri
Page 7 and 8: VII Finally we would like to thank
Page 9 and 10: IX provided: the Northern region la
Page 11 and 12: XI TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION
Page 13 and 14: XIII 6.4.2 Effectiveness...........
Page 15 and 16: XV Table 22: Educational compositio
Page 17 and 18: XVII Figure 28: Total cultivated ac
Page 19 and 20: XIX Figure 66: Farm viability per f
Page 21 and 22: XXI Figure 104: Supported and non-s
Page 23 and 24: Box 1: Food Security Food Security
Page 25 and 26: 2 Description of the Context in Sie
Page 27 and 28: 2.2 Population As mentioned in the
Page 29 and 30: Healthcare is essentially provided
Page 31 and 32: Regarding other key macroeconomic v
Page 33 and 34: As portrayed in Table 4, agricultur
Page 35 and 36: 3 The Agricultural Sector In this s
Page 37 and 38: land negotiation and agreements. Ac
Page 39 and 40: Table 5: National Rice Production a
Page 41 and 42: Figure 10: Top imports - Sierra Leo
Page 43 and 44: Figure 12: Livestock (ship-equivale
Page 45 and 46: 3.2 Agro-Ecologies, Agricultural Pr
Page 47 and 48: as the slash and burn system, the v
Page 49 and 50: Figure 15: Top agricultural goods p
Page 51 and 52: The different agricultural areas de
Page 53 and 54:
The Mangrove Swamps Mangrove Swamps
Page 55 and 56:
equipment are generally not conside
Page 57 and 58:
Gbonkolenken chiefdoms in the Moyam
Page 59 and 60:
Table 10: Crop yield level in West
Page 61 and 62:
• Research system: restructure by
Page 63 and 64:
• Repatriation of after tax profi
Page 65 and 66:
Kambia 1529,847 668,281 2198,128 30
Page 67 and 68:
epresents a very minor proportion (
Page 69 and 70:
Table 14: National Requirement for
Page 71 and 72:
Prior to the civil war, chiefdoms h
Page 73 and 74:
Table 17: Sierra Leone and Sub-Saha
Page 75 and 76:
Tonkolili, while the The Deutsche W
Page 77 and 78:
- One hundred km of feeder roads an
Page 79 and 80:
5 Survey Methodology In this sectio
Page 81 and 82:
Upper Bambara 1 11 1 Mandu 1 6 1 To
Page 83 and 84:
the Sierra Leone survey at hand. 30
Page 85 and 86:
( Iv − Fv) d = n Where: d is the
Page 87 and 88:
+ Value of Stocks Value of Sales =
Page 89 and 90:
household boundaries. This means th
Page 91 and 92:
east) attainable locally, therefore
Page 93 and 94:
introduced by comparing output per
Page 95 and 96:
6 Survey Results This section addre
Page 97 and 98:
Table 22: Educational composition o
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 23: Sources of income for sm
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 26: Allocation of acreage to
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 28: Total cultivated acreage
Page 105 and 106:
Labour As a measure for household l
Page 107 and 108:
delivered to the cooperatives that
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 35: Membership of farmer ass
Page 111 and 112:
6.2 Evaluation of the economic perf
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 41: Crop mix categories in t
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 44 Farm Types (Number, Perce
Page 117 and 118:
calculations the overall performanc
Page 119 and 120:
Table 28: Economic results of the s
Page 121 and 122:
Table 30: Economic results of the s
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 48: Farm Net Income for an a
Page 125 and 126:
Output Value There is a difference
Page 127 and 128:
Figure 52: Output value of rice per
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 56: Distribution of tree cro
Page 131 and 132:
household working unit (area/hhWU).
Page 133 and 134:
In Northern districts and under PF
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 65 and Figure 66 illustrate
Page 137 and 138:
situation of the farm household in
Page 139 and 140:
Thus, both the farm crop orientatio
Page 141 and 142:
Figure 71: Output value of tree and
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 74: Upland/IVS/Boli rice out
Page 145 and 146:
79). This would imply that the most
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 81: Labour productivity per
Page 149 and 150:
Box 3: Crop production losses Crop
Page 151 and 152:
criteria set (OECD and Europe Aid,
Page 153 and 154:
6.4.1 Relevance As mentioned, Relev
Page 155 and 156:
134
Page 157 and 158:
Figure 89: Adequacy of support prov
Page 159 and 160:
Figure 92 summarise the perceptions
Page 161 and 162:
Figure 93: Change in production as
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 96). The results in terms of
Page 165 and 166:
impact to the improvement of their
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 99: Expected sustainability
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 101: Changes in different ar
Page 171 and 172:
Figure 103 illustrates that the con
Page 173 and 174:
In relation to NFI per farm househo
Page 175 and 176:
Figure 108 and Figure 109 illustrat
Page 177 and 178:
Figure 110: Head of household engag
Page 179 and 180:
Figure 111: Relevance of income sou
Page 181 and 182:
Figure 113: Number of tool assets p
Page 183 and 184:
7 Conclusions The aim of this study
Page 185 and 186:
could either release labour to the
Page 187 and 188:
their farming activity (as reflecte
Page 189 and 190:
and the opportunities to sell farm
Page 191 and 192:
structure and soil fertility status
Page 193 and 194:
8 References Action Aid Internation
Page 195 and 196:
n°29 (Frenken, K. ed.) FAO Land an
Page 197 and 198:
MAFFS Ministry of Agriculture, Fore
Page 199 and 200:
Salazar R (2004) Mission report, Si
Page 201 and 202:
9 Appendices Appendix I. Questionna
Page 203 and 204:
yrs Number of children 10-18 yrs Nu
Page 205 and 206:
Most important Source of Income Gif
Page 207 and 208:
Associations Or Groups Please name
Page 209 and 210:
Adequacy Of Kind Of Support Conside
Page 211 and 212:
Level of Improvement in production
Page 213 and 214:
4.7 Could you explain why? Training
Page 215 and 216:
The Most Important Crop According t
Page 217 and 218:
Soil condition What is the soil dep
Page 219 and 220:
Maize In case of Maize Storage begi
Page 221 and 222:
opportunities Post office facilitie
Page 223 and 224:
LABOUR INPUT- FOOD CROPS: 1. Name o
Page 225 and 226:
FARM OUTPUT/FARM INCOME Now we will
Page 227 and 228:
Cassava Sorghum Ground Nuts Beans/v
Page 229 and 230:
Figure: % of farms per farm type in
Page 231 and 232:
Figure: Average farm size per farm
Page 233 and 234:
Figures: Labour productivity for IV
Page 235 and 236:
Figure Labour productivity for Coco
Page 237 and 238:
Appendix V. Price of main crops and
Page 239:
The mission of the Joint Research C
show all

The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone - agrilife - Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?