02.08.2013 Views

High-Efficiency Facemill MFPN - Kyocera

High-Efficiency Facemill MFPN - Kyocera

High-Efficiency Facemill MFPN - Kyocera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Wiper edge<br />

BIG<br />

5<br />

5Mill Mill<br />

Economical<br />

New design<br />

Toughness<br />

Pioneering a new era<br />

Roughing and general-purpose facemill with<br />

10-cornered pentagonal inserts<br />

ap (mm) Depth of cut<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

0.5<br />

Two-face restraint<br />

Major<br />

cutting edge<br />

BI<br />

Low cutting force due to helical cutting-edge<br />

5<br />

design<br />

MSRS<br />

Conventional<br />

0.06 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6<br />

fz (mm/t) Feed per tooth<br />

+10°<br />

(A.R.)<br />

Main cutting edge<br />

No. 1<br />

<strong>MFPN</strong><br />

<strong>High</strong> feed machining substantially improves efficiency<br />

NEW<br />

<strong>MFPN</strong><br />

■Pentagonal double-sided tip excellent for<br />

constraining stability<br />

■10-cornered insert cuts cost per corner<br />

■Helical cutting-edge design with low<br />

cutting force reduces chattering<br />

■Helical cutting-edge design<br />

·<strong>High</strong> rake angle (A.R. Max. +10°)<br />

0.7<br />

Cutting edge<br />

angle 45°<br />

BI<br />

Principal force<br />

Feed force<br />

Back force 5M<br />

Fractures suppressed with double-edge position<br />

■Double-edge position<br />

·Major cutting edge makes chips thin,<br />

thereby reducing impact load at entrance<br />

and exit of workpiece<br />

Double-edge position<br />

Five Advantages of BIG Pentagon<br />

Main cutting edge<br />

No. 2<br />

Cutting force comparison (N)<br />

2000<br />

1600<br />

1200<br />

800<br />

400<br />

●Cutting force comparison<br />

0<br />

<strong>High</strong>ly stabilized accuracy due to two-face<br />

constraint facing the major cutting edge<br />

16% reduction in comparison<br />

with competitor A<br />

14% reduction in<br />

comparison with GM<br />

GM SM<br />

Competitor A Competitor B<br />

●Cutting conditions<br />

Workpiece :S50C<br />

Vc=150m/min, fz=0.1mm/t, apxae=5x105 mm, Machine :M/C(BT50)<br />

●Fracture resistance comparison<br />

PNMU1205ANER-GM<br />

(PR1225)<br />

Competitor C<br />

(PVD negative insert)<br />

Competitor D<br />

(PVD negative insert)<br />

No. of impacts<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

×<br />

×<br />

×<br />

×<br />

×<br />

×<br />

fz=0.5mm/t fz=0.6mm/t fz=0.7mm/t<br />

●Cutting conditions<br />

Workpiece :SCM440(38~42HS)<br />

Machine :BT50 M/C<br />

Vc=100m/min, fz=0.5~0.7mm/t,<br />

apxae=2x100mm (workpiece with 20mm width slot)<br />

0.5mm/t<br />

0.6mm/t<br />

0.7mm/t<br />

:No cracks<br />

× : Insert cracks

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!