03.08.2013 Views

Copyright by Athena Ranice Stacy 2011 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Athena Ranice Stacy 2011 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Athena Ranice Stacy 2011 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from following the entire accretion history over the stellar lifetime <strong>of</strong> ∼ 3 Myr.<br />

However, extrapol<strong>at</strong>ing from the first 5000 years (see Fig. 4.1) implies th<strong>at</strong><br />

both stars we have discussed are likely to grow significantly more massive.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y should certainly be massive enough to avoid a white dwarf f<strong>at</strong>e and<br />

make a neutron star or black hole, assuming they do not die as PISNe and<br />

leave behind no remnant <strong>at</strong> all. If they in fact die as core-collapse SNe, we can<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>e the effect <strong>of</strong> rot<strong>at</strong>ion on the l<strong>at</strong>er SN explosion. Though a black hole<br />

remnant is more likely, particularly for the more massive star <strong>of</strong> sink A, we can<br />

derive a more conserv<strong>at</strong>ive estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>by</strong> considering a neutron star remnant.<br />

As described in Woosley and Heger (2006), the total rot<strong>at</strong>ional energy <strong>of</strong> a<br />

resulting neutron star <strong>of</strong> radius 12 km and gravit<strong>at</strong>ional mass <strong>of</strong> 1.4 M⊙ will<br />

be Erot 1.1 × 10 51 (5 ms/P ) 2 erg, where P is the rot<strong>at</strong>ion period <strong>of</strong> the<br />

neutron star. <strong>The</strong>y find th<strong>at</strong> for Erot to be comparable to the energy <strong>of</strong> a<br />

hypernova, ∼ 10 52 erg, P would need to be ≤ 2 ms. In their low-metallicity<br />

models th<strong>at</strong> begin with stars rot<strong>at</strong>ing with similar ɛ values to wh<strong>at</strong> we found<br />

for sink A (ɛ ∼ 0.45), they infer resulting neutron star rot<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong><br />

do meet this criterion. <strong>The</strong>y find the same results even for lower ɛ like for<br />

those <strong>of</strong> sink B, though this is only if magnetic torques are not included in the<br />

model. Thus, even using the more conserv<strong>at</strong>ive estim<strong>at</strong>e it is conceivable th<strong>at</strong><br />

the rot<strong>at</strong>ional energy reservoir found in sink A and B <strong>of</strong> our work could be<br />

enough to power a hypernova. If the stars rot<strong>at</strong>e more rapidly, <strong>at</strong> nearly their<br />

break-up velocity as we predict, then hypernovae would be even more likely.<br />

Will there still be enough angular momentum for the collapsar engine<br />

to work on these stellar scales? If we use the low estim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> J(r) = ɛ JKep(r) =<br />

ɛ √ GMsink r, then on these scales the angular momentum for both sinks still<br />

easily meets the required J > JISCO, especially if their high ɛ values continue as<br />

122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!