redtone international berhad - Announcements - Bursa Malaysia
redtone international berhad - Announcements - Bursa Malaysia
redtone international berhad - Announcements - Bursa Malaysia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(e) If a member of the Board or Audit Committee has an interest, direct or<br />
indirect, in a RRPT to be reviewed by the Board or Audit Committee as the<br />
case may be, he will abstain from all deliberations and decision-making by<br />
the Board or Audit Committee in respect of such RRPT.<br />
(f) The Audit Committee reviews RRPTs once in a financial year, to ensure that<br />
relevant internal review procedures are adhered to and carried out on normal<br />
commercial terms that are not detrimental to the interest of the minority<br />
shareholders.<br />
2.7.1 Threshold of Authority<br />
The Group has in place a level of authority policy to facilitate the orderly and efficient<br />
operations of the Group. Managers are given a reasonable and acceptable level of<br />
authority to approve limited purchases and payments. For amounts exceeding the<br />
managers’ authority i.e. RM8,000, prior approval of the Executive Directors is<br />
required.<br />
2.8 Statement by Audit Committee<br />
The Audit Committee of the Company has seen and reviewed the procedures<br />
mentioned in Section 2.7 above and is of the view that the said procedures are<br />
sufficient to ensure that the RRPTs entered into are monitored, tracked and identified<br />
in a timely manner and are not more favorable to the Related Parties than those<br />
generally available to the public and are not detrimental to the minority shareholders.<br />
The processes and procedures in connection thereto are reviewed annually.<br />
2.9 Disclosure of RRPTs<br />
In accordance with Rule 10.09 of the AMLR, disclosure shall be made in the Annual<br />
Report of the Company of a breakdown of the aggregate value of all transactions<br />
conducted during the financial year, names of Related Parties involved in each type<br />
of RRPT and their relationship with the REDtone Group pursuant to the shareholders’<br />
mandate.<br />
3. RATIONALE FOR THE PROPOSED SHAREHOLDERS’ MANDATE<br />
The RRPTs entered or to be entered into by the Group are in the ordinary course of business<br />
and are of a revenue or trading nature which are likely to occur with some degree of<br />
frequency and arise at any time and from time to time.<br />
These transactions may be time-sensitive and confidential in nature, which made it<br />
impractical to seek shareholders’ approval on a case-by-case basis before entering into such<br />
transactions. As such, the Board is seeking the shareholders’ mandate pursuant to Rule<br />
10.09 and Guidance Note 8 of the AMLR to allow the Group to enter into such RRPTs on<br />
terms that are not more favourable to the Related Parties than those generally available to the<br />
public and not to the detriment of minority shareholders of the Company.<br />
The REDtone Group and the Related Parties have close co-operation and good<br />
understanding of each other’s business need, thus providing a platform where all parties can<br />
benefit from conducting the RRPTs. In addition, REDtone Group would have an advantage of<br />
familiarity with the background, financial well-being and management of the Related Party,<br />
thus enabling more informed commercial decisions to be made and minimising any risk of<br />
interruptions to the Group’s day-to-day operations. Given the complementary nature of the<br />
Related Parties’ activities, as well as the fact that the activities are in the ordinary course of<br />
business and are of a revenue or trading nature, it is anticipated that the RRPTs would occur<br />
on a frequent and recurrent basis. In addition, the REDtone Group will also leverage on the<br />
Related Party’s resources.<br />
By procuring the Proposed Shareholders’ Mandate and renewing the same on an annual<br />
basis, this would eliminate the necessity to convene separate general meetings from time to<br />
time. This would reduce substantially administrative time, inconvenience and expenses<br />
8