04.08.2013 Views

weighted and two stage least squares estimation of ... - Boston College

weighted and two stage least squares estimation of ... - Boston College

weighted and two stage least squares estimation of ... - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where B c n denotes the complement <strong>of</strong> the event Bn. We note that<br />

P (B c n) ≤ P (|vmx ˆ − vmx| ≥ n −(1/2+δ) ) + P (|vmn ˆ − vmn| ≥ n −(1/2+δ) )<br />

+<br />

Zc <br />

j=1<br />

P (|z [j]<br />

mx ˆ − z[j]<br />

mx| ≥ n −(1/2+δ) ) + P (|z [j]<br />

mn ˆ<br />

− z[j]<br />

mn| ≥ n −(1/2+δ) ) (A.22)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the right h<strong>and</strong> side goes to 0 by the well known n-rate <strong>of</strong> convergence <strong>of</strong> the extreme<br />

estimators under the compact support conditions. Also, we note that<br />

where<br />

P (n 1/2 |An| > ɛ, Bn) ≤ P (Cn > ɛ) (A.23)<br />

Cn = 1<br />

√ n<br />

+<br />

Zc <br />

j=1<br />

+ I[z [j]<br />

i<br />

n <br />

I[vi ∈ [vmx − hn − n −(1/2+δ) , vmx − hn]] + I[vi ∈ [vmn + hn − n −(1/2+δ) , vmn + hn]]<br />

i=1<br />

I[z [j]<br />

i<br />

∈ [z[j]<br />

mx − hn − n −(1/2+δ) , z [j]<br />

mx − hn]]<br />

∈ [z[j] mn + hn − n −(1/2+δ) , z [j]<br />

<br />

mn + hn]] > 0]<br />

We note that by the assumption that vi, z (c)<br />

i<br />

has positive density everywhere on the rectangle,<br />

E[Cn] = o(1) <strong>and</strong> Var(Cn) = o(1), so P (Cn > ɛ) → 0, establishing the desired result. <br />

We now prove the theorem for the density <strong>weighted</strong> closed form estimator. The pro<strong>of</strong><br />

applies to either <strong>of</strong> the <strong>two</strong> trimming assumptions, <strong>and</strong> their corresponding support assump-<br />

tions. For clarity <strong>of</strong> exposition, we focus on the first set <strong>of</strong> assumptions, <strong>and</strong> simply note<br />

that Assumptions C5’,C7’, <strong>and</strong> C8’ could be used whenever C5,C7, <strong>and</strong> C8 are referred to<br />

in the pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>: We work with the relationship:<br />

ˆΞ − Ξ0 = 1<br />

n<br />

<br />

ˆi<br />

τni<br />

n ˆf i=1<br />

∗ −<br />

i<br />

i<br />

f ∗ <br />

i<br />

+ 1<br />

n<br />

<br />

i<br />

τni<br />

n f<br />

i=1<br />

∗ <br />

− E<br />

i<br />

<br />

i<br />

+ E<br />

τni<br />

f ∗ i<br />

− Ξ0<br />

31<br />

i<br />

τni<br />

f ∗ i<br />

<br />

(A.25)<br />

(A.26)<br />

(A.27)<br />

(A.24)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!