06.08.2013 Views

Mercury in Fish 1.45 Mb - Arnika

Mercury in Fish 1.45 Mb - Arnika

Mercury in Fish 1.45 Mb - Arnika

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 17 <strong>Mercury</strong> Policy Project<br />

<strong>Mercury</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Fish</strong><br />

with the US conditions that produced cases<br />

of methylmercury poison<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased steadily for the past decade or so,<br />

but is still low by <strong>in</strong>ternational standards, at<br />

7.5 kg per capita per year, or on average only<br />

144 grams per week. 36<br />

roughly the same as <strong>in</strong> the US <strong>in</strong> some<br />

countries, to two or three times higher <strong>in</strong> other<br />

countries (as discussed above). Per capita<br />

consumption <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es is 31 kg/year,<br />

survey of Kolkata consumers (cited earlier),<br />

found a median <strong>in</strong>take of 700 g/week, or 36<br />

kg/year.<br />

In general, the likelihood of excessive<br />

methylmercury exposure and associated risk<br />

of adverse health effects <strong>in</strong>crease with average<br />

average consumption. As the total number of<br />

the absolute number of events <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

consumed. And among people who eat greater<br />

eat the higher-mercury predatory species are<br />

more likely to consume larger quantities of<br />

The risk from methylmercury is therefore<br />

probably greater, and affects more consumers,<br />

<strong>in</strong> some European countries, <strong>in</strong> India, and <strong>in</strong><br />

the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es than it is <strong>in</strong> the US, <strong>in</strong> two<br />

respects. First, consumers who prefer to<br />

higher. Second, a far larger fraction of the<br />

population <strong>in</strong> parts of the EU and <strong>in</strong> Asia has<br />

week, compared to the US. For people who<br />

to exceed reference levels.<br />

Put another way, for people who eat large<br />

that should trigger concerns about potentially<br />

excessive exposure are correspond<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

<strong>in</strong>take for half the population exceeds 500<br />

1.0 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg of mercury need to<br />

be on the “watch list,” but additional varieties<br />

do as well, those with, say, more than 0.25<br />

mg/kg. The math is <strong>in</strong>exorable: A person who<br />

gets the same mercury dose as someone who<br />

eats 600 grams conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0.50 mg/kg, or 300<br />

grams conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1.0 mg/kg. And <strong>in</strong> each of<br />

these cases the dose <strong>in</strong>gested by a person of<br />

average weight will exceed all reference levels<br />

by a wide marg<strong>in</strong>.<br />

If public health monitor<strong>in</strong>g studies were<br />

conducted with appropriately sensitive health<br />

assays <strong>in</strong> each country covered by this report,<br />

we would therefore expect to see patterns<br />

of excessive exposure, broad risks of subcl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

toxic effects, and occasional cases of<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical methylmercury poison<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

countries. How prevalent these effects are can

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!