VAT News - empcom.gov.in
VAT News - empcom.gov.in
VAT News - empcom.gov.in
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
supplies. Claims that are still open will be settled. Closed<br />
claims, i.e. cases <strong>in</strong> which the taxable person had not<br />
challenged HMRC’s refusal to accept his claim on the<br />
ground of unjust enrichment, and those <strong>in</strong> which<br />
HMRC’s refusal had been upheld <strong>in</strong> court, can be resubmitted<br />
for consideration. However, it is not clear what<br />
time limits apply <strong>in</strong> this respect. If HMCR treats the<br />
resubmitted claim as a new claim, it will be out of time<br />
under the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom’s three-year limitation<br />
period. HMRC have been asked to clarify this po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />
Revenue Brief 0 /09.<br />
From our correspondent Karen Kill<strong>in</strong>gton<br />
KPMG UK LLP<br />
United States<br />
California<br />
Nexus of Internet vendors<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g the success of the New York Department of<br />
Taxation <strong>in</strong> the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs before the New York Superior<br />
Court concern<strong>in</strong>g the so-called “Amazon-tax”, 2<br />
other states are follow<strong>in</strong>g suit <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g similar legislation.<br />
In California, two pieces of legislation have been proposed<br />
thus far to change the def<strong>in</strong>ition of nexus and<br />
force certa<strong>in</strong> Internet vendors to collect sales and use<br />
taxes. Proposal AB 27 establishes a presumption of nexus<br />
forc<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> remote sellers to collect and remit Californian<br />
sales and use taxes. This presumption is satisfied<br />
when a resident of California, directly or <strong>in</strong>directly,<br />
refers potential customers to a remote seller that generates<br />
over USD 10,000 <strong>in</strong> sales annually. The legislation<br />
further seeks to implement the Multistate Tax Commission’s<br />
controversial Nexus Bullet<strong>in</strong> 9 -1, which would<br />
impose the obligation to collect sales tax on retailers who<br />
utilize <strong>in</strong>dependent contractors to perform repair services.<br />
AB 178 is comparable to AB 27, except that it does<br />
not <strong>in</strong>clude the MTC Nexus Bullet<strong>in</strong> provisions.<br />
In Connecticut, Proposal SB 80 also establishes a presumption<br />
of nexus when a resident of Connecticut,<br />
directly or <strong>in</strong>directly, refers potential customers to a<br />
remote seller that generates over USD ,000 <strong>in</strong> sales<br />
annually, with effect from 1 April 2009. The bill was<br />
referred to the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Committee on F<strong>in</strong>ance, Revenue<br />
and Bond<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
In M<strong>in</strong>nesota, Proposals SF 282 and HF 401 would also<br />
impose the obligation to collect sales and use tax on<br />
remote sellers when a resident of M<strong>in</strong>nesota, directly or<br />
<strong>in</strong>directly, refers potential customers to them, which<br />
generates over USD 10,000 <strong>in</strong> sales. Proposal SF 282 was<br />
referred to the Senate Taxation Committee and proposal<br />
HF 401 to the House Taxation Committee.<br />
In North Carol<strong>in</strong>a, the Revenue Laws Study Committee<br />
has proposed Legislative Proposal # to impose the obligation<br />
to collect sales and use tax on remote Internet<br />
sellers (<strong>in</strong> addition to impos<strong>in</strong>g the state’s sales and use<br />
tax on “digital goods”). The bill has yet to be <strong>in</strong>troduced.<br />
Connecticut<br />
Nexus of Internet vendors<br />
See California.<br />
Michigan<br />
© IBFD INTERNATIONAL <strong>VAT</strong> MONITOR MARCH/APRIL 2009<br />
<strong>VAT</strong> <strong>News</strong><br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition of sales price<br />
The def<strong>in</strong>ition of the term “sales price” has been<br />
amended to <strong>in</strong>clude consideration received by a seller<br />
from a third party.<br />
PB 4 8, 2008.<br />
Conformation to SSUTA<br />
By way of Public Acts 4 , 4 7 and 4 9, 27 Michigan has<br />
amended its state law <strong>in</strong> conformity with the Streaml<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
Sales and Use Tax Agreement (SSUTA 28 ) by means<br />
of:<br />
– allow<strong>in</strong>g consideration received by auto dealers<br />
from a manufacturer as reimbursement pursuant to<br />
a “family plan”-type discount transaction to be<br />
exempt from sales tax;<br />
– clarify<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> which certified service<br />
providers are eligible for a sales tax exemption; and<br />
– updat<strong>in</strong>g and clarify<strong>in</strong>g various def<strong>in</strong>itions.<br />
Redef<strong>in</strong>ition of gross receipts<br />
Michigan SB 10 8, which was signed <strong>in</strong>to law as Public<br />
Act 4 , removed taxes, fees, <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>come, royalties,<br />
surcharges, and other elements from the concept of gross<br />
receipts for the purposes of the state’s bus<strong>in</strong>ess tax.<br />
PA 4 , 9 January 2009.<br />
Biomass-harvest<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Michigan HB 8 2, which was signed <strong>in</strong>to law as Public<br />
Act 41 , amended the sales tax provisions to provide an<br />
exemption for the sale of mach<strong>in</strong>ery that is capable of<br />
simultaneously harvest<strong>in</strong>g crops and biomass residue, or<br />
that is manufactured for the purpose of harvest<strong>in</strong>g agricultural<br />
biomass grown solely as an energy source.<br />
Medicaid medical services<br />
Michigan HB 192, which was signed <strong>in</strong>to law as Public<br />
Act 440, amended the Use Tax Act to provide that the use<br />
or consumption of medical services provided by Medicaid-managed<br />
care organizations be taxed <strong>in</strong> the same<br />
manner as tangible personal property.<br />
PA 440 of 9 January 2009.<br />
2 . See Amazon.com LLC and Overstock.com Inc. v. New York State Department<br />
of Taxation under <strong>VAT</strong> Case Notes <strong>in</strong> this issue, p. 1 .<br />
27. See Michigan HB 4 80, 4 and , respectively.<br />
28. See Robert F. van Brederode,“The Harmonization of Sales and Use Taxes<br />
<strong>in</strong> the United States”, International <strong>VAT</strong> Monitor (2007), pp. 4 8 to 44 .<br />
1